Bob, I need to learn how to do those in-lines quotes at some point, bear with me.... but to your questions:
So the question isnt whether or not she was willing to hurt the company, its whether or not it was legal to do so?
Well... yeah. Her union called for a strike, and she went on strike. That was (is) part of the recognized process, when it gets to that point. In 1993 it apparently got to that point.
Do you feel that the public is unaware of what the company is trying to do to the pilots?Awkward wording but yes - I feel that the public is unaware of what the company is 'trying to do' to the pilots. I would not have singled out the pilots though, I would have included all work groups.
Do I think the public *would* be sympathetic towards the pilots (and other work groups) if they fully understood what the company was subjecting the work groups to? Possibly. That being said, I felt Crandall's recent letter was well written and compelling. Does the AA work force have a spokesperson or representative who can frame a discussion and present labor viewpoints and counter arguments as well as Crandall did for the company? Please send me a link if so...
Do I think that a good way to 'educate' the public is to purposely create situations that (for example) cause a customer to miss a life long friend's funeral, or a daughter's playoff soccer game, or a business conference that their company had paid thousands of dollars to exhibit at? Not so much...
Have you ever read the Railway Labor Act? Are you familiar with the history of it?
No and yes. I have not read the RLA, but I am aware as to why it was passed and why it was\is very much needed. I love history.
Strikes were all illegal at one time, they became legal because the law could not stop it.
I think I understand the sentiment....
Look, I feel like most employees are on the same page when it comes to their feelings towards management. The point of my initial post was that a very small number of employees are potentially jeopardizing the long term viability of the company through what, in my opinion, are senseless and selfish (and we will probably now see if illegal...) acts that *really* impact a *lot* of other people. And to what end? We have to destroy the village to save it?
The other 90-95% of employees, many of whom are likely just as p*ssed off, such as my wife, continue to do their jobs in a professional and non-vindictive manner.