the perception and/or reality will be that us, at laa, lost compensation elsewhere to satisfy lus. that's what i stated. i'm not openly or secretly cheering for lus to lose their insurance, i'm looking at this realistically. if it was 1951, we would have more arrows in our quiver to try and coerce the company to give us all lus insurance. unfortunately, it's not. when everything and anything is considered a job action by today's courts...the company can dig in on this.
as far as a laser focus on wages...well, it looks like lus had a laser focus on wages to get to our pay level when they reached their stand-alone contract.
let's remember what our ancestors did...'b' scale, 'c' scale. wages. lower wages for new hires to increase their TOS wages.