Other LBFO concerns:
1. Forfeiture of the 30-in-7 rule. (Currently, the company can not force any f/a to fly more than 30 hours in a rolling 7-day period. High time flyers can waive their 30-in-7, but the company can not make you do it.)
2. Particularly, when coupled with the substitution of 10 "24s" for 5 "48s." (For those who are thoroughly mistified...(lol), a "48" is two 24-hour duty free periods back to back. Our contract currently calls for a minimum of 5 "48s" on a regular line of flying; i.e., there must be at least 5 48-hour long (or more) rest breaks in each schedule.
I was talking with a friend who flies for Frontier about this. She warned me against this. I said that with the 30-in-7 rule going away and the ability of the company to build lines up to 100 hours (and you know they will all be as close to this as possible), I could foresee 3-day trip, 1 day off, 3-day trip, 1 day off, 3-day trip, 1 day off for almost the whole month.
She said that they had something similar at Frontier, and that company is building lines with 6 days on, 1 day off, 6 days on kind of scheduling. She also said that you would not believe the number of Frontier f/as out on IODs that are directly related to f/a fatigue.
3. The 100 hour max on the monthly schedules. I know that the document calls for an "average of 80 to 90 hours per line," but considering that for every 6 lines they build to 100 hours (as opposed to 80-85 hours), they have just eliminated the need for another flight attendant with all those pesky benefits, how many of us believe that AMR will build the lines to only 80-85 hours out of the goodness of their hearts? (And, this is much easier to do with Pref Bidding than with the current system.)
4. 16 day cap on days on (with maximum of 18 days in actual operation). Here again, this is only for lines that are 85 hours or more, but refer to question in item 3.
5. The retiree health insurance retention. It says that the employee may sign up for a Medicare supplement insurance through the company to be administered by a 3rd party. Well, hell I can sign up for a Medicare supplement insurance without the company's help. The only benefit would be any premium could be paid for with the company's contribution to the current prefunding plan which will be placed in a Health Resources account. (Note, according to my Medicare book from the SSA, most Medicare supplement plans have a zero premium.)
All this appears to be just like APFA in the past, they are only looking at pay rates, not duty rigs or anything else. And, through tough negotiation, they have increased the pay rates 1.5% over what the company proposed in the term sheet. 7.5% increase over 6 years in the term sheet. 9% over 6 years in the LBFO. At last, Mother can have that operation!
For me, I see no reason at all to vote Yes.