Battle lines drawn in FAA fees fight

Paul

Veteran
Nov 15, 2005
1,102
0
The FAA pleads poverty every four or five years, when it goes to Congress for renewal of its basic funding structure, including ticket taxes, passenger fees, air traffic charges and a host of other income sources to pay for controller salaries, tower, centre and en-route facilities upkeep and its safety inspection and oversight services.

This time, with its renewal expiring in late September, is different: air traffic is back at near-record levels as private and corporate aviation booms, a new generation of very light jets is poised to compete with commercial airlines for airspace and services, and airports are at breakpoint. And this time, the FAA’s air traffic controllers are demanding pay raises in a new contract that the FAA says it cannot afford as it prepares to transition to satellite-based traffic control. It needs this new technology to handle the anticipated 25% increase in traffic over the next decade. Showing Congress it can control spending is critical to getting the legislature to sign off on the satellite-based air traffic control system.

And this time, administration officials suggest the formula to pay for it all will be different. FAA administrator Marion Blakey began laying the groundwork last autumn for a new regime of user fees. As the controller union contract fight intensified early this year, she stepped up the suggestion that users would have to pay fees that would be in closer proportion to their actual burden on the system.

Flight International