Bundy. why no interest?

[EastUS1]

 
Just a minor point of now mostly clinical curiosity here: What, in your estimation, should have been done about the following "whack job militia"? How should they have been dealt with?
 
https://www.google.com/search?q=armed+black+panthers&client=firefox-a&hs=IHt&rls=org.mozilla:en-US😱fficial&channel=sb&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=q3pdU8KzKaiksQTr8oCIBQ&ved=0CCcQsAQ&biw=1920&bih=926
 
 
"The Panther's basic ideology was one of armed protection against police oppression." http://xroads.virginia.edu/~UG01/barillari/pantherchap1.html

 
Still eagerly awaiting ANY answer from the devout "left" to the above questions....? 😉

 

[EastUS1]

 
 
..... there is plenty of evidence to convict.

 
On what charges? Specifically those that presumably warranted the huge amounts of taxpayers' money spent on the BLM's latest fiasco, ie; here's your cattle back...we were just kidding.

 

[AdAstraPerAspera]

Dude. I'm a flight attendant. Not a federal prosecutor. Get real.
 
Maybe you should direct your inquiries to the office of US District Court for the State of Nevada.

 

[EastUS1]

Dude. I'm a flight attendant. Not a federal prosecutor. Get real.
 
Maybe you should direct your inquiries to the office of US District Court for the State of Nevada.

 
Perhaps some more reasoned reluctance should've been shown before advancing your idea that "..... there is plenty of evidence to convict" then? Just sayin'....

 

[AdAstraPerAspera]

Hmm….. nah.

 

[Ms Tree]

And you pompously pretend to know all this HOW? I didn't realize you held a seat within the inner circle of the BLM's leadership...?

If he would have followed the court order the BLM would not have needed to come down to remove the cattle. How hard is that to follow?

 

[Ms Tree]

Just a minor point of now mostly clinical curiosity here: What, in your estimation, should have been done about the following "whack job militia"? How should they have been dealt with?
 
https://www.google.com/search?q=armed+black+panthers&client=firefox-a&hs=IHt&rls=org.mozilla:en-US😱fficial&channel=sb&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=q3pdU8KzKaiksQTr8oCIBQ&ved=0CCcQsAQ&biw=1920&bih=926
 Zealand
 
"The Panther's basic ideology was one of armed protection against police oppression." http://xroads.virginia.edu/~UG01/barillari/pantherchap1.html

Never been a fan of the panthers. If they violated the law, put them in jail.

 

[Dog Wonder]

Would you shoot human beings over ANY of this nonsense?

People who don't own guns have no intention of shooting people. Sounds like Bundy would have some one else do it.

 

[Ms Tree]

Err, if he's breaking the law, why not just send out a couple of Serriffs with an an arrest warrant, instead of the "Bureau of Land Management Brigade"?

Jurisdiction.

 

[EastUS1]

If he would have followed the court order the BLM would not have needed to come down to remove the cattle. How hard is that to follow?

 
So why, after all that ridiculous effort and expense, were the cattle returned to him?

 

[Ms Tree]

But yet on the books? Shouldn't people be arrested in droves anyway, since said laws still exist? Sigh! So it's now just a degree of what's enforceable?...And not any real principle of nobly upholding any and all laws, no matter what?

Federal law supercedes state law so what the state's say is irrelevant. It's not against the law.

 

[EastUS1]

People who don't own guns have no intention of shooting people.

 
Think on that just a bit further. Should we then suppose the BLM, who've plenty of guns, "intend" on shooting people?

 

[EastUS1]

Federal law supercedes state law so what the state's say is irrelevant. It's not against the law.

 
Explain that to the states now permitting marijuana use while the federal government still forbids it by law. Should all those who thus trespass against the feds' notions be arrested?

 

[Ms Tree]

So why, after all that ridiculous effort and expense, were the cattle returned to him?

Asked and answered. Don't know. Ask the BLM.

 

[Ms Tree]

Explain that to the states now permitting marijuana use while the federal government still forbids it by law. Should all those who thus trespass against the feds' notions be arrested?

According to the law yes they should. Obama instructed the DOJ not to pursue it. Legally I don't think it was a good decision. Pragmatically it makes sense not to clog the already over burdened court system. This will eventually make its way to the higher courts or the Fed will legalize it first.