EAS Program to be Slashed?

FM2436

Veteran
Jan 8, 2003
747
11
Interesting Press Release from Regional Airline Partners concerning comments made by WV's Senator Rockefeller and the loss of EAS funded commercial service at Bluefield WV. The articles reads that the Senator is saying that current EAS markets within 200 miles of a major hub airport will no longer be eligible for EAS funding. The last page of the 4-paged RAP Press Release identifies those small communities that would loss EAS funding if enacted. Some are currently served by US Airways Express code-sharing partners. May be the unfortunate opportunity for US Airways to dump a few of it's smallest markets. I'd bet these markets cost a lot of time, money, and congestion at the connecting hub. A sign of the times ahead for the smallest non-hub regional airports and regional airlines???

http://www.regionalaviationpartners.org/RA...ativeUpdate.pdf
 
Presumably US doesn't think it is unprofitable to code-share with someone flying to an EAS market. The EAS contract isn't a lifetime contract.

Honestly, what difference does it make if a gate says BLF rather than ROA?
 
Presumably US doesn't think it is unprofitable to code-share with someone flying to an EAS market. The EAS contract isn't a lifetime contract.

Honestly, what difference does it make if a gate says BLF rather than ROA?

As one who lives 15 minutes from BLF, I couldn't agree more. However, Colgan hasn't received any EAS money for BLF since sometime last year, so BLF service was eliminated earlier this month at the same time that Colgan upgraded service into BKW using Saab 340s. Part of the reason Colgan gave for terminating BLF service was the Saab upgrade, as they felt it could not safely operate the Saab into BLF. However, the real reason was the lack of EAS funding for BLF.

Now, the plot thickens. Here is an article from 11/16/07 issue of the Bluefield Daily Telegraph... note my bolded part.
Airport: What now? Loss of flights could mean opportunity

Bluefield Daily Telegraph

Where do we go from here? That’s the question on the minds today of those responsible for the operation of the Mercer County Airport. It is a huge dilemma that must include an analysis of how the airport lost commercial flights this past week.

On Monday, Colgan Air flew its last flight from Bluefield, and along with the plane went one of the most substantial components of regional economic growth. Commercial air service is absolutely essential to any progressive economic blueprint, and the value of that service to this region over the past decades has been immeasurable.

We have lost that vital service.

Last Monday evening — only hours after the last plane took off from Mercer County Airport — U.S. Sen. Jay Rockefeller came to the Daily Telegraph editorial board with detailed documentation from the FAA that underscored why we had lost the service. Simply, we hadn’t pushed to have it continued. We had not made a case for the continuation of Essential Air Service funding, and we hadn’t voiced any need for other available federal funding. The air service, Colgan, had not received any EAS subsidies in its final year, and decided to end the flights this past Monday. Who could blame them.

But even with the shameful record, there was no guarantee that service would have been continued. FAA figures showing passenger usage was far below acceptable levels to justify continued funding. For all intents and purposes, federal tax money (EAS) paid pilots to land empty planes and take off again, empty. Clearly, there’s no benefit to such continued wasteful spending.

This past week, finger-pointing has been the most popular game in town.

Whose fault was it that we lost our commercial air service? The Airport Authority? The County Commission? Our elected representatives?

We think the real fault must be shared by all of us: Every person who decided to use alternative flights from other airports. The old phrase, “Use it or lose it†— popular when rail passenger service through Bluefield was subsidized years ago — smacked us again this past week.

But finger-pointing, in whatever direction, has never generated economic progress. It’s time to rethink — with critical assessment — where we go from here. We must look for a solution to a problem that wasn’t going to improve by throwing more tax money at it.

It’s time not for blame, but for a search for opportunity.

Dilemmas such as the one we’ve endured this past week can often be a springboard to greater successes because those crises demand new approaches.

Gov. Joe Manchin, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, U.S. Rep. Nick Rahall, State Sen. Truman Chafin and others are pressing for practical answers that will work. Several options have been considered this past week that could work, such as an affordable air taxi shuttle concept.

We fully expect a workable plan to be unveiled soon.

But there’s a very important dynamic to any solution: We absolutely must guarantee local and regional stewardship in effectively managing whatever replaces fixed-schedule commercial flights. The single-most important component in that guarantee is in visionary administration — oversight to ensure practical direction and muscle to enforce responsible management. Had that type of administration been in place, deadlines, compliance, grants and other procedures would not have been missed. It is realistic to assume that commercial aviation would still be in place at the airport.

During this Thanksgiving week, there is much we as a community, a county and a region can be supremely thankful for. It is where we live, it is home. As a community, a county and a region, we must protect all we hold dear. It must be a sanctuary for our children and our grandchildren.

We must remember that the loss of another critical component to our economic well-being is not acceptable.


(Let me preface the following remarks... I am not a native of WV, I am originally from civilized territories north of the Mason-Dixon.)

Now, given the way the backward politics works in the southern part of this state, this is no surprise. As far as the politicians in CRW are concerned, the state ends in BKW. We have a saying at the university I teach at... the world ends at the town line on the south and in CRW to the north. To many in this area, that's their world. Looking beyond the state border (or even the CRW border) is a foreign incomprehensible concept.

This is not the first screwup politicians made down here because they are too lazy and unmotivated. Everything here runs via the "good ol' boy" network, and if you're not in the loop, you go without. There's been a statistic that in Mercer County (where BLF is located), about 85% of the population receive a "check", either welfare or social security. That doesn't help the business climate here. In neighboring counties it's worse.

Now, all we are reading in the local rag is the finger pointing as to who didn't try to get the EAS subsidy restored. We even have the local manager of the regional AAA saying she's going to call Colgan to see how BLF can get its service back... like she has any pull. Senator Rockefeller definitely blames the locals, since the BKW local politicians rallied when the EAS was up the last time and was able to get BKW kept. (Of course, the true reason BKW was kept was because it was more than 200 miles from CLT, whereas BLF was under 200 miles.) I'm sure we can find exceptions in EAS for cities like BLF.