- Thread Starter
- #16
700UW:
700UW said: “Lets see, how many times did you spout the UCT/ICT with United?â€
USA320Pilot comments: I never said it would occur, I said it was being discussed by the parties and disclosed some specific terms.Shortly before his departure, Dave Siegel admitted the transaction was his and David Bronner’s desire in front of the F/O and myself on our jumpseat. Moreover, Bronner spoke of his interest in 4 separate news media interviews. Siegel told us the reason it did not occur was because SARS and the Iraqi War did not last long and UAL did not violate DIP financing terms.
700UW said: Lets see you said the company would win the airbus arbitration.
USA320Pilot comments: It was my opinion the company would win the A320 overhaul arbitration, but they did not. That’s different than the UCT/ICT, which was fact and offers were presented. In regard to the A320 overhaul, how many of the aircraft have had heavy maintenance performed by US Airways. US Airways will bring A320 heavy maintenance in-house and outsource other maintenance and will furlough thousands of employees in the process.
700UW said: You said the company would envoke the "Painful" cause in the IAM M&R contract. There is no such clause and nothing was envoked. You said the company would move base mtc to an undesirable location where english was not the main langauge and that you could not commute to and from.
USA320Pilot comments: How much more painful does it have to be? What’s happening to your job and work group? I never said maintenance would not be the main language. I said overhaul could be outosurced where english is not spoken very well. Instead the IAM is going to provide the largest employee group cost cuts, much greater than the “askâ€. However, as you said, “the concession stand is closedâ€, until it was kicked wide open by the bankruptcy court.
With all due respect, I don’t "hate the player or the game", but when would now be a good time for you to “confront reality†(for the first time)?
Regards,
USA320Pilot
700UW said: “Lets see, how many times did you spout the UCT/ICT with United?â€
USA320Pilot comments: I never said it would occur, I said it was being discussed by the parties and disclosed some specific terms.Shortly before his departure, Dave Siegel admitted the transaction was his and David Bronner’s desire in front of the F/O and myself on our jumpseat. Moreover, Bronner spoke of his interest in 4 separate news media interviews. Siegel told us the reason it did not occur was because SARS and the Iraqi War did not last long and UAL did not violate DIP financing terms.
700UW said: Lets see you said the company would win the airbus arbitration.
USA320Pilot comments: It was my opinion the company would win the A320 overhaul arbitration, but they did not. That’s different than the UCT/ICT, which was fact and offers were presented. In regard to the A320 overhaul, how many of the aircraft have had heavy maintenance performed by US Airways. US Airways will bring A320 heavy maintenance in-house and outsource other maintenance and will furlough thousands of employees in the process.
700UW said: You said the company would envoke the "Painful" cause in the IAM M&R contract. There is no such clause and nothing was envoked. You said the company would move base mtc to an undesirable location where english was not the main langauge and that you could not commute to and from.
USA320Pilot comments: How much more painful does it have to be? What’s happening to your job and work group? I never said maintenance would not be the main language. I said overhaul could be outosurced where english is not spoken very well. Instead the IAM is going to provide the largest employee group cost cuts, much greater than the “askâ€. However, as you said, “the concession stand is closedâ€, until it was kicked wide open by the bankruptcy court.
With all due respect, I don’t "hate the player or the game", but when would now be a good time for you to “confront reality†(for the first time)?
Regards,
USA320Pilot
