First " HYDROXY ", now a useless cure for Covid !
- Thread starter NewHampshire Black Bears
- Start date
xUT
Veteran
Trump did some good things, his handling of COVID is/was terrible.
Where is the King?
MIA since the election...
delldude
Veteran
Dog Wonder
Veteran
xUT
Veteran
Dog is correct. Trump did the opposite of Fauci advice, in fact, he was ready to fire him.
Lead by example, Trump rallies made fun of people whom wore masks and social distance.
No, IMHO, Trump should be prosecuted for murder.
delldude
Veteran
delldude
Veteran
xUT
Veteran
Dog Wonder
Veteran
KCFlyer
Veteran
Have you ever been in a situation where you weren't sure of something and made a decision...only to find that the decision you made wasn't the best? Did you press on regardless because you didn't want to be viewed as "weak" or a "flip flopper" because you had the audacity to change your view? Trump never waivers once a decision is made..he presses on. Indeed - he doubles down. Should his view fail, he turns to the thing that all great men do in tough times - blame.
delldude
Veteran
About your search, you need to get ahold of Sundar and tell him his search algorithm needs tweeked.Nothing there saying Trump did the opposite of Fauci's advice. Lot of articles where Trump may have disagreed, but nothing where He advised the public to do something Fauci and the task force advocated.
Twofer special on hangings? So where did Trump get this idea masks weren't needed?
He also acknowledged that masks were initially not recommended to the general public so that first responders wouldn’t feel the strain of a shortage of PPE.
He explained that public health experts "were concerned the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply.”
By early April, the Strategic National Stockpile had been depleted, and around the same time President Trump invoked the Defense Production Act to have manufacturing chains across the U.S. focus on making vital medical equipment such as ventilators and masks.
Fauci continued to say that they wanted to give as many masks as possible to front line workers and emergency personnel.
“We wanted to make sure that the people, namely the health care workers, who were brave enough to put themselves in a harm way, to take care of people who you know were infected with the coronavirus and the danger of them getting infected,” Fauci concluded.
https://thehill.com/changing-americ...fauci-why-the-public-wasnt-told-to-wear-masks
https://thehill.com/policy/healthca...mask-stance-was-taken-out-of-context-by-trump
xUT
Veteran
delldude
Veteran
Funny this slipped by MSM:
There are currently 281 studies, including 209 peer-reviewed studies (as of April 17, 2021) showing that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective for treating both early and late stage COVID patients. The drug is also very cheap to manufacture.
See the data here. More data here.
Dr. Stella Immanuel demands an apology after studies prove she was right about Hydroxychloroquine
Study that found hydroxychloroquine harmful in treating COVID-19 has been retracted.
The study “found that the use of a regimen containing hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine (with or without a macrolide) was associated with no evidence of benefit, but instead was associated with an increase in the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and a greater hazard for in-hospital death with COVID-19. These findings suggest that these drug regimens should not be used outside of clinical trials and urgent confirmation from randomised clinical trials is needed.” See the retracted study here and here.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext
We always aspire to perform our research in accordance with the highest ethical and professional guidelines. We can never forget the responsibility we have as researchers to scrupulously ensure that we rely on data sources that adhere to our high standards. Based on this development, we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources. Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted.
We all entered this collaboration to contribute in good faith and at a time of great need during the COVID-19 pandemic. We deeply apologise to you, the editors, and the journal readership for any embarrassment or inconvenience that this may have caused.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274621/
Dog Wonder
Veteran
4 Things to Know About Dr. Stella Immanuel, Trump's New Favorite COVID Doc
So much for "do no harm."
delldude
Veteran
Does that make the retraction by Lancet and NIH more palatable for you?4 Things to Know About Dr. Stella Immanuel, Trump's New Favorite COVID Doc
So much for "do no harm."www.menshealth.com
