What's new

Flt. returns to gate:

Can I report cactus for a rule 33 violation?

Rule 33 - dumba**
 
Jim, it that is the case, you are correct, she should be removed from flying status. But what I am saying is no one hear actually know what occurred. Do you know for a fact that she said what they claim? Or even if she said that, that is is factual? Instead of being compassionate on here, she has been demonized. As far as taking her meds...we don't know anything! I know a few who are "diagnosed" bipolar and it is very different from what i saw on that video. I am not a physician and I will not venture to diagnose. The one thing I can guarantee is that her intentions that day were not to have what happened occur. And since this could be us or anyone close to us we should shut-up. There is no difference between mental disease, or myocardial infarctios, grand mal seizures, strokes, etcetera...Would we be snickering and sniping if one of the prior had happened? And let's say she was on meds and did not take them... Do you know her circumstances? Was it willfull not taking them? Or is she on reserve and has been reassigned, forgot them, and hasn't been able to get to them. Honestly, it does not matter. We should keep our mouth shuts and support her and each other as we should. It is the kind compassionate things to do. And yes, I would gladly fly with her.

Excuse me there is a VAST difference between mental illness and myocardial infarctions (heart attacks), and strokes. A flight attendant having a heart attack does not endanger other flight attendants or passengers by his/her actions, and you know it as well as I do.

The government does not allow pilots to be licensed if they have been diagnosed with certain conditions. Mental illness is one of those disqualifying conditions. The same should be true for flight attendants. Whether she is taking the medication or not, her judgment and her mental faculties are impaired. She should not be responsible for the lives and safety of others.
 
The government does not allow pilots to be licensed if they have been diagnosed with certain conditions. Mental illness is one of those disqualifying conditions. The same should be true for flight attendants. Whether she is taking the medication or not, her judgment and her mental faculties are impaired. She should not be responsible for the lives and safety of others.
[/quote]

Couldn't have said it better, Jim. If you are diagnosed with an illness and are under a medicine regimen, it is your responsibility to make sure you take your meds and do not endanger your co-workers and the people around you. One of the working fas injured her wrist while trying to calm her down.
 
"The one thing I can guarantee is that her intentions that day were not to have what happened occur"

Really???????? AASTEW????????

If you don't know any of the other circumstances then how do you know this?

You about in the same ward as she is..

Problem being we have to many over the hill, bitter, divorced, lonely old flight attendants..

Hey I have an Idea..

Lets go back to the Pan Am rules of stews..

Sky stew was never meant to be a "career job"

25, first child, or married........ Out!!
 
Haha.. Right El Stew...

Been in the Airlines for 30 years.. Dated at least a dozen f/a's... know all about the 100 mile rule, wheels in the well, awesome layover parties, p-lifts and lower load rendezvous.. ah the good ole airline dayzzzzzl..

All I'm saying is she's 42 and lost it big time... Get the help, straighten things out and move on.. You probably did yourself a favor by flippin out and getting punted from the airline industry...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top