Move over NW...
Frontier is expanding Memphis based flying:
-MEM - FLL n/s 1x/day
-MEM - LAS n/s 5x/week
-MEM - DEN 3x/day (increase from 2x/day)
-MEM - MCO 2x/day
They tried LAX as a focus city, and that didn't work, so, why not try MEM?
Northwest does have hub ops at MEM. I have never been to MEM and I admittedly don't know much about the market. How would MEM residents/pax respond to an F9 build-up there?
NW is know to be brutal in defending what the perceive to be "their territory". When F9 started service from LAX to MSP NW responded by adding service from LAX to DEN. I wonder what their response will be this time.
I think NWA could be just mean enough to go head-to-head with F9 on their DEN-MEXICO service if F9 gets a little to greedy in MEM. NWA is the worst at being revengeful in this business. just my thoughts................
Uh, USAir's operating/labor costs were significantly higher than PSA's at the time of the merger, and I am not sure that USAir employees would have wanted to drop to the payscales at PSA. While people love to blame USAir mgmt for their ineptness in the West Coast situation, they are not ENTIRELY at fault for paying top of scale in the industry at the time. They just could not compete with the lower cost competition.I have to say that I really respect and admire NWAs hard-a$$ stance on competition. If US Airways had that mentality in the 90s, they would not have killed PSA's west coast operation and pulled out of BWI. SWA ran them off in both markets. I think NWA kind of treats Memphis like the red headed step child -- it is their smallest hub and is mostly RJ service (correct me if I am wrong on this somebody). I guess this will test NWAs commitment to the MEM operation. Should be interesting...
Uh, USAir's operating/labor costs were significantly higher than PSA's at the time of the merger, and I am not sure that USAir employees would have wanted to drop to the payscales at PSA. While people love to blame USAir mgmt for their ineptness in the West Coast situation, they are not ENTIRELY at fault for paying top of scale in the industry at the time. They just could not compete with the lower cost competition.
Uh, USAir's operating/labor costs were significantly higher than PSA's at the time of the merger, and I am not sure that USAir employees would have wanted to drop to the payscales at PSA. While people love to blame USAir mgmt for their ineptness in the West Coast situation, they are not ENTIRELY at fault for paying top of scale in the industry at the time. They just could not compete with the lower cost competition.
Kinda funny that they're going up against their codeshare partner FL on the MEM to MCO route. hmmmmm? :huh: