What's new

Glo-Bull Warming and Science

The chart goes back 600,000 years.

Not sure where you are going with the polar bear tangent???

NASA is in the business of junk science now?

Living in the Houston area, I know many NASA employees. Progressive/liberal they are not.

Would you like a slice of the moon for your ham sandwich?


even NASA is uncertain as the causation. All you have is a history of temperatures. So what.

Although this wasn’t mentioned during the program, several interglacials before the Eemian were also 1-3 degrees Celsius, or perhaps even more, warmer than today’s “unprecedented” temperatures. During the Eemian, according to the 2007 IPCC report itself, sea levels were 4-6 metres (14-20 feet) higher than today’s, and in previous interglacials sea levels may have been 15 metres (50 feet) higher.

Glacials and interglacials over 700,000 years. Interglacials are above the line.

Again, no human influences caused these previous interglacial rises in temperatures and sea levels. So, why would we be foolish enough to believe that rising temperatures and sea levels in our interglacial, the Holocene, are anything but natural as well, although we may be accelerating warming slightly with our carbon emissions?

That is, sea levels may rise, say, two metres in 1,000 years rather than 1,100, due to human influence. Surely humans a thousand years from now can handle two metres of sea level increase, rather than the, say, 1.75 metres that would otherwise have occurred.

The program noted that polar bears evolved about 150,000 years ago out of brown (grizzly) bears. In other words, they evolved to exploit glacial, Arctic conditions just before the Eemian warming. So, how did they survive the lack of Arctic ice during the Eemian? And does their survival then offer clues to how the bears will survive low-ice conditions in our interglacial?

The Rest of the Article
 
The chart i posted above is fact. That is not a normal shift.

I get it. You don't like Al Gore and you like George Carlin. I do not understand how that furthers any substantiation of your argument.


The post I reference is fact also....dispute that.
 
evidence_CO2.jpg


Source: NASA

(I know, they are just stupid government employees telling us all that the moon is not made of cheese)

That chart is linked the NOAA and the disgraced Michael Mann. He has been proven to be fabricating evidence and when pushed to reveal the sources for his data he suddenly claims he has lost them.

Michael Mann's hockey stick chart was obviously false. Because of its deceitful appearance, many scientists protested Mann's graph and the data behind it. However, Mann initially refused to reveal any of his data or methods - even though his work was supported by the U.S. government - which made it exceedingly difficult for other scientists to replicate his work.

In the case of the Mann et al [1998,1999] study, used for the IPCC's 'hockey stick'￾ graph, Mann was initially unable to remember where the data was located, then provided inaccurate data, then provided a new version of the data which was inconsistent with previously published material, etc.

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995
Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
There has been no global warming since 1995
Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
 
Predictions Confront the Data


The Claim: 50 million climate refugees will be produced by climate change by the year 2010. Especially hard hit will be river delta areas, and low lying islands in the Caribbean and Pacific. The UN 62nd General assembly in July 2008 said: …it had been estimated that there would be between 50 million and 200 million environmental migrants by 2010.


The Test: Did population go down in these areas during that period, indicating climate refugees were on the move? The answer, no.


The Proof: Population actually gained in some Caribbean Island for which 2010 census figures were available. Then when challenged on these figures, the UN tried to hide the original claim from view. See: The UN “disappears” 50 million climate refugees, then botches the disappearing attempt


The Change in claim: Now it is claimed that it will be 10 years into the future, and there will be 50 million refugees by the year 2020.


1990 IPCC predictions compared to actual measurements 2011

normalised.png
 
Besides the risks of Alien Invasions, heres a sample of other ludicrous events placed on GW

Global Warming Causes STD’s
Blame climate change; everyone else is doing it. From an increase in severe acne to all societal collapses since the beginning of time, just about everything gone wrong in the world today can be attributed to climate change. Here’s a list of 100 storylines blaming climate change as the problem.


1. The deaths of Aspen trees in the West
2. Incredible shrinking sheep
3. Caribbean coral deaths
4. Eskimos forced to leave their village
5. Disappearing lake in Chile
6. Early heat wave in Vietnam
7. Malaria and water-borne diseases in Africa
8. Invasion of jellyfish in the Mediterranean
9. Break in the Arctic Ice Shelf
10. Monsoons in India
11. Birds laying their eggs early
12. 160,000 deaths a year
13. 315,000 deaths a year
14. 300,000 deaths a year
15. Decline in snowpack in the West
16. Deaths of walruses in Alaska
17. Hunger in Nepal
18. The appearance of oxygen-starved dead zones in the oceans
19. Surge in fatal shark attacks
20. Increasing number of typhoid cases in the Philippines
21. Boy Scout tornado deaths
22. Rise in asthma and hayfever
23. Duller fall foliage in 2007
24. Floods in Jakarta
25. Radical ecological shift in the North Sea
26. Snowfall in Baghdad
27. Western tree deaths
28. Diminishing desert resources
29. Pine beetles
30. Swedish beetles
31. Severe acne
32. Global conflict
33. Crash of Air France 447
34. Black Hawk Down incident
35. Amphibians breeding earlier
36. Flesh-eating disease
37. Global cooling
38. Bird strikes on US Airways 1549
39. Beer tastes different
40. Cougar attacks in Alberta
41. Suicide of farmers in Australia
42. Squirrels reproduce earlier
43. Monkeys moving to Great Rift Valley in Kenya
44. Confusion of migrating birds
45. Bigger tuna fish
46. Water shortages in Las Vegas
47. Worldwide hunger
48. Longer days
49. Earth spinning faster
50. Gender balance of crocodiles
51. Skin cancer deaths in UK
52. Increase in kidney stones in India
53. Penguin chicks frozen by global warming
54. Deaths of Minnesota moose
55. Increased threat of HIV/AIDS in developing countries
56. Increase of wasps in Alaska
57. Killer stingrays off British coasts
58. All societal collapses since the beginning of time
59. Bigger spiders
60. Increase in size of giant squid
61. Increase of orchids in UK
62. Collapse of gingerbread houses in Sweden
63. Cow infertility
64. Conflict in Darfur
65. Bluetongue outbreak in UK cows
66. Worldwide wars
67. Insomnia of children worried about global warming
68. Anxiety problems for people worried about climate change
69. Migration of cockroaches
70. Taller mountains due to melting glaciers
71. Drowning of four polar bears
72. UFO sightings in the UK
73. Hurricane Katrina
74. Greener mountains in Sweden
75. Decreased maple in maple trees
76. Cold wave in India
77. Worse traffic in LA because immigrants moving north
78. Increase in heart attacks and strokes
79. Rise in insurance premiums
80. Invasion of European species of earthworm in UK
81. Cold spells in Australia
82. Increase in crime
83. Boiling oceans
84. Grizzly deaths
85. Dengue fever
86. Lack of monsoons
87. Caterpillars devouring 45 towns in Liberia
88. Acid rain recovery
89. Global wheat shortage; food price hikes
90. Extinction of 13 species in Bangladesh
91. Changes in swan migration patterns in Siberia
92. The early arrival of Turkey’s endangered caretta carettas
93. Radical North Sea shift
94. Heroin addiction
95. Plant species climbing up mountains
96. Deadly fires in Australia
97. Droughts in Australia
98. The demise of California’s agriculture by the end of the century
99. Tsunami in South East Asia
100. Fashion victim: the death of the winter wardrobe


And the list goes on. The truth is climate change is causing some of these events, but the earth’s average temperature has been increasing and decreasing since the beginning of time. Maybe the increase in UFO sightings can’t be pinpointed to climate change but certainly animals will adapt to new habitats as the climate changes. But climate change and adaptation to it is nothing new. There’s an underlying assumption that human activity is causing the climate to change in many of these stories, but the scientific consensus on what causes climate change is anything but a consensus. Temperatures have risen and fallen many times before and the earth was cooling as recently as the period from the 1940s to the 1970s giving rise to fears of a coming ice age:


“At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel Calder warned, “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind.” C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization said, “The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed.”


The other implication of this list is that a reduction in Co2 with cap and trade policies like Waxman-Markey and Boxer-Kerry will cure problems as disparate as hurricanes, wars, crime, hunger and…cow infertility. The problem is that no one can actually claim that a reduction of Co2 will prevent these occurrences; one can only speculate that they will be worse in a world that has more rather than less Co2. Given cap and trade’s massive economic consequences and negligible effects on the earth’s temperature, this is a bold and potentially very costly speculation.
 
How come the Creationists haven't started a thread?


With all due respect Dog....get your head outa your butt...

7 Days:

I like your post, everything GW is of the uttermost importance at the quickest moment.....without any reasonable input......from the opposition. It has been the left's ' Our way or the highway ' view for quite some time. I remember back in the eighties, Time magazine's lead front page story of how we were entering a period of 'global cooling'.....a possible ' new ice age '.......suddenly that view disappeared.....why??
Now after a large amount of the data to prove GW has been proven BS, the GW clan keeps pushing, even though data now indicates global cooling. Redistribution of wealth and Obama's claim of energy usage necessarily sky rocketing are the mantra we now must face.
Let's reelect Obama now.
 
Come now.

At least look at the chart before you spout off on your third post about it.

It represents CO2 ppm over years. Geez.

C'mon, dispute 4.5 billion years of CO2 and not some gov't data not totally encompassing all data for the argument.

You drinking gov't koolaid or what techie? Geez. :lol:
 
:lol: :lol: :lol: This is too laughable. Yes lets put out figures involving 600000 years. Who actually can prove it? Did we actually find out how the dinosaurs became extinct or do we still have 100s of theories that can't be proven? Using too many years to perceive a concept, makes it impossible to really prove. So we guess. But when we do it in the name of science, we add some sort of credibility. Science has changed since I was a child and will continue to change. The 'World Will End Tomorrow' crowd has found a new way to incite fear in people with the man-made global warming nonsense.

Check this out when you have one thing coming out, and quickly a rebuttle.

NASA blows hole in global warming

No It Doesn't!

Oh yeah we are dealing with a real problem because scientists can't agree. Like I said, nobody wants to lose government funding to prove their point!

But continue with your greener wiener methods, after all it is a free country. Don't knock me because I want to live life to the fullest and will do my best to survive this warming phenomenom...and that is all it is. In my parts it's called SUMMER! Which is the height of man-made glow bull warming talk 😛
 
You are an expert at missing the point.

How does 4.5 billion years of CO2 fit in with creationsm, Stump?
 
The idea that 7 billion people along with all the buildings, waste, then add the loss of forestation, pollution in the water (just to mention a few things) does not have an effect on our climate is fool hardy in my opinion. How big an effect it has and will have is not certain.

Even if it does not have an effect on the climate (unlikely at best) how about the fact that asthma and other breathing disorders have sky rocketed? Water sources are being contaminated. Soil quality is being degraded. Unfortunately, nothing gets done in this country until it is too late. This country is reactive instead of proactive. How much is a human life worth. For republicans and business, not very much it would seem.
 
The idea that 7 billion people along with all the buildings, waste, then add the loss of forestation, pollution in the water (just to mention a few things) does not have an effect on our climate is fool hardy in my opinion. How big an effect it has and will have is not certain.

Even if it does not have an effect on the climate (unlikely at best) how about the fact that asthma and other breathing disorders have sky rocketed? Water sources are being contaminated. Soil quality is being degraded. Unfortunately, nothing gets done in this country until it is too late. This country is reactive instead of proactive. How much is a human life worth. For republicans and business, not very much it would seem.

Because with each passing day it's been proven to be junk science from people with a progressive political agenda. The incidence of breathing disorders can come from many sources on of which is living in an area with a fair amount of air polution. which is merely a distractor as it has little if anything to do with global warming.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top