Glo-Bull Warming and Science

[Ifly2]

RS also does have good, good old fashioned investigative journalists writing for em. Always has.

Maybe it is a foreign concept, but when I want to learn about a subject, I look at a variety of sources, and intentionally seek out those whose bias or leanings may seem contrary to my understanding or my own thoughts.

Like after reading the Adams bio, I felt compelled to read Hamilton's and Jefferson's, just to get the other side of the story. I use the Heritage Foundation's guide to the Constitution as my principle commentary/source on that document. I read the WSJ more than the Times.

It really is enlightening.

It doesn't mean you have to become a drone, or assimilated, or indoctrinated.

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Ah Yes, the 'political' section of the great scientific magazine, 'The Rolling Stone'.... 😛
Maybe you should buy a 'radio'...
🙄 :wacko:

Never a good idea to attack the "label" or the writer, as opposed to attacking the actual factual data used in the source.

 

[Ms Tree]

Unless it's FOX or MSNBC then attack both.

 

[xUT]

Never a good idea to attack the "label" or the writer, as opposed to attacking the actual factual data used in the source.

From the IPPC 'only'?
Little myopic isn't it?

I look at a wide range of data, some I have posted here.
To post the articles from RollingStones (political section) as sole source is ignorant.
Yes, I know that it isn't what you want to hear, but after all, us Christians believe the world is 6000 years old...

Remember, scientists created electro shock therapy, among 'other' scientific improvements.

B) xUT

 

[xUT]

RS also does have good, good old fashioned investigative journalists writing for em. Always has.

Maybe it is a foreign concept, but when I want to learn about a subject, I look at a variety of sources, and intentionally seek out those whose bias or leanings may seem contrary to my understanding or my own thoughts.

Like after reading the Adams bio, I felt compelled to read Hamilton's and Jefferson's, just to get the other side of the story. I use the Heritage Foundation's guide to the Constitution as my principle commentary/source on that document. I read the WSJ more than the Times.

It really is enlightening.

It doesn't mean you have to become a drone, or assimilated, or indoctrinated.

I like Mother Jones or The Onion.
Just about as factual as an any other rag.

 

[Ifly2]

There are none so blind...

 

[xUT]

There are none so blind...

Yes you are.

 

[Ifly2]

Jesus, on stewardship


Matthew 25.14-30

 

[xUT]

Jesus, on stewardship


Matthew 25.14-30

Funny how you atheists are so good at quoting scripture when you deem it suits your purpose.

Matthew 24:4

 

[Ifly2]

Just puttin' it in your terms

Jesus was a good man, with some good things to say, that folks can learn from

Nothing wrong with that

BTW, it's religion, and the idea of God being/as defined by man, that I don't believe in.

 

[southwind]

Just puttin' it in your terms

Jesus was a good man, with some good things to say, that folks can learn from

Nothing wrong with that

BTW, it's religion, and the idea of God being/as defined by man, that I don't believe in.

Let me guess! You were abducted by aliens and sexual experiments were conducted and have left you scared for life!

 

[Ifly2]

Merely surrounded by mostly well meaning folks who believe in stuff that doesn't make sense. Stuff thatnwas pushed on/taught to them by other folks who should know better, and who also know that thay have to tear their "followers" down in order to get them into the frame of mind required to be willing to "accept" the story they are about to be told and the "wisdom" they need to "become whole".

"The only one who should be washing your brain is you". -Kumare

 

[southwind]

So.....you "were" abducted!

 

[Ifly2]

Just rained on

 

[southwind]

Can understand why someone who believes they were abducted and sexually experimented on, would not believe in God !