Can understand why someone who believes they were abducted and sexually experimented on, would not believe in God !
RS also does have good, good old fashioned investigative journalists writing for em. Always has.
Maybe it is a foreign concept, but when I want to learn about a subject, I look at a variety of sources, and intentionally seek out those whose bias or leanings may seem contrary to my understanding or my own thoughts.
Like after reading the Adams bio, I felt compelled to read Hamilton's and Jefferson's, just to get the other side of the story. I use the Heritage Foundation's guide to the Constitution as my principle commentary/source on that document. I read the WSJ more than the Times.
It really is enlightening.
It doesn't mean you have to become a drone, or assimilated, or indoctrinated.
Never a good idea to attack the "label" or the writer, as opposed to attacking the actual factual data used in the source.
Never a good idea to attack the "label" or the writer, as opposed to attacking the actual factual data used in the source.
Wbat do aliens and their possible existence have to do with God?
It really is enlightening.
It doesn't mean you have to become a drone, or assimilated, or indoctrinated.
Just go around making stuff up much do ya'?
I wasn't abducted, just indoctrinated.
I like how now they are starting to admit that it is all BS and they were wrong, but that socialism and government control are still the correct policies to follow even though we have no real understanding of global climate.
It was always a politcal movement not a scientific one, to bad most scientist sold out for government dollars and the media and most every teacher in America pushed the brainwashing indoctrination.
The AGW pimpers, they now admit they do not understand what is happing. Their models have been very wrong. Their very main assumption that CO2 is the cause (When it most likely is a symptom) is falling apart, hell even the IPCC said AGW isn't happening like they thought but we still need to install government control because of the ever increasing global population.
When ever the government and their supporters claim there is a criss that requires more government to fix it, it is a good rule of thumb to run in the opposite direction.
The IPCC for starters.And the sources for your opinions are where?
Who is this "they" you speak of?