What's new

Glo-Bull Warming and Science

Not surprised.  If you are interested you can look for it your self.  Not doing your homework for you.
 
Ms Tree said:
There is a difference between saying something and discovering something. Hence the different responses.

So those models are not being updated? Cars are running on 100+ yr old technology. Model T is not the same as a 2014 Jetta TDI.
oh give me a break thats splitting hairs... and no they arent being updated... when new models are released not showing global warming they are shunned by the community..  
 
proof is in the pudding if i show you new models right now that show you no global warming you will denounce it as fallacy 
 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/07/27/new-nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-in-global-warming-alarmism/
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/06/20/global-warming-of-the-earths-surface-has-decelerated-viewpoint/
 
Knotbuyinit said:
No no no, it's "carbon pollution" !  According to information posted on Obama's "Climate Change" website, carbon pollution is the biggest driver in climate change. Did you know that in 132 years, the earth's surface temperature (land and ocean surfaces) have risen 1.5 degrees F !! In 132 years and after hundreds of billions of tons of CO2 dumped in the atmosphere the temperature has risen steadily 0.011 degrees F per year for the last 132 years. I'm scared . . . real scared!
 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/climate-change
 
 
i heard the talking heads using a new word... its not global warming or climate change anymore, now they are touting global climate disruption... 
 
http://www.scientific-alliance.org/scientific-alliance-newsletter/global-warming-global-climate-disruption
 
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/05/06/report-uses-phrase-climate-disruption-as-another-way-to-say-global-warming/
 
http://www.westernjournalism.com/now-climate-disruption/
 
http://news.sciencemag.org/climate/2014/05/lets-call-it-climate-disruption-white-house-science-adviser-suggests-again
 
how can the science be decided, if they havent even decided on a name yet?
 
On a continually evolving planet, every time science makes a catastrophic claim, Mother Nature steps in and slaps them in the face.
 
Politicians attempting to control the global populace want taxation to curb something they have absolutely no control or patent understanding of what is a natural process in the evolution of the planet.
 
Mentally challenged humanoids think and feel everyday should be sunny skies, peaches and cream. This is not the way it is here.
 
I really don't care what you call it! ------- B.S. under any other name is still B.S.!!!
 
PHXConx said:
Wow, climate disruption! Sounds like something you would hear on The Weather Channel. 
 
Is that akin to the planet having a fever?
 
You know chili hot dogs and beer have caused a slight disruption with me....
 
Its a global climate disruption, as in this global warming flat line is disrupting their attempts at social change by terrorizing people who use carbon... 
 
Ms Tree said:
Not surprised.  If you are interested you can look for it your self.  Not doing your homework for you.
 
 
Ms Tree said:
Maybe you should read up on how temp variances can affect coral reefs.
 
 
the Great barrier  reef has taken 600,000 years to get where it is now there have been 6 glaciation periods since it began growing... so tell me how do temp variances affect coral reefs, if 6 glaciation periods followed by 5 warming periods amazingly hasnt destroyed them..
 
tell me, how does it affect coral reefs?
 
btw... you wouldnt have been doing his homework since it was you who told him to look it up, if you think its important then you look it up 
 
Imagine that scientists fudging data for grants.
Imagine that, I have been saying that and I'm sure I said it somewhere on this thread. I also believe that maybe global heating is really happening. My argument is that IT IS NOT MAN MADE!

If man contributes anything to climate changes, it's his stupidity believing he contributes anything to climate change. Oh maybe nuclear plants contribute to climate change, but I thought that was colder temperatures. And most of us felt those Arctic Vortexes! Coincidence?

The earth has been regulating and fixing itself for a cajillion years, and I'm sure it will be here long after our great, great to the 50th power grandchildren are long gone.
 
PHXConx said:
 
 
 
 
the Great barrier  reef has taken 600,000 years to get where it is now there have been 6 glaciation periods since it began growing... so tell me how do temp variances affect coral reefs, if 6 glaciation periods followed by 5 warming periods amazingly hasnt destroyed them..
 
tell me, how does it affect coral reefs?
 
btw... you wouldnt have been doing his homework since it was you who told him to look it up, if you think its important then you look it up 
There is quite a bit of information out there about how the reefs were affected by the glacial and inter-glacial ages.  
 
He asked me to post the info and that would have been doing his homework.  
 

Latest posts

Back
Top