What's new

Glo-Bull Warming and Science

Breaking: A peer reviewed admission that “global surface temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2008″ – Dr David Whitehouse on the PNAS paper Kaufmann et al. (2011)

It is good news that the authors recognise that there has been no global temperature increase since 1998. Even after the standstill appears time and again in peer-reviewed scientific studies, many commentators still deny its reality. We live in the warmest decade since thermometer records began about 150 years ago, but it hasn’t gotten any warmer for at least a decade.

The researchers tweak an out-of-date climate computer model and cherry-pick the outcome to get their desired result. They do not use the latest data on the sun’s influence on the Earth, rendering their results of academic interest only.
They blame China’s increasing coal consumption that they say is adding particles into the atmosphere that reflect sunlight and therefore cool the planet. The effect of aerosols and their interplay with other agents of combustion is a major uncertainty in climate models. Moreover, despite China’s coal burning, data indicate that in the past decade the amount of aerosols in the atmosphere has not increased.

Either man-made and natural climatic effects have conspired to completely offset the warming that should have occurred due to greenhouse gasses in the past decade, or our estimation of the ‘climate sensitivity’ to greenhouse gasses is too large.
This is not an extreme or ‘sceptic’ position but represents part of the diversity of scientific opinion presented to the IPCC that is seldom reported.
http://wattsupwithth...ann-et-al-2011/

Obama Quietly Handing Over Billions of Dollars to the UN in the Name of Global Warming

It’s not surprising that this year’s conference has been ignored. Remember EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson admitted to me that EPA’s global warming regulations are based primarily on the now exposed Climategate science of the completely discredited UN IPCC. The Atlantic Monthly said of Climategate "the stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering." And the UK Telegraph wrote that “This is the worst scientific scandal of our generation."
It’s not surprising that this year’s conference has been ignored. Remember EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson admitted to me that EPA’s global warming regulations are based primarily on the now exposed Climategate science of the completely discredited UN IPCC. The Atlantic Monthly said of Climategate "the stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering." And the UK Telegraph wrote that “This is the worst scientific scandal of our generation."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0NM0eeODOJk

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=704a64c3-c4b6-0747-65d9-b2d6e8ebe36f
 
My guess is that somebody has to flip the bill for all this greener weiner technology. The UN fined countries that don't lower their carbon emissions. Of course the USA was on that list. Bush refused to give them a penny, so Obama is more than happy to tax US!

The US has lowered their CO2 emissions the past 50 years, regardless what people think. Sometimes life is better than anything you read in books or on the internet. When we had factories and the trains, planes and cars weren't regulated, I remember snow being black or dirty brown. Now I can see it white.
 
The Economist has a climate change of heart . . .

OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, “the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade.”

Temperatures fluctuate over short periods, but this lack of new warming is a surprise. Ed Hawkins, of the University of Reading, in Britain, points out that surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range of projections derived from 20 climate models (see chart 1). If they remain flat, they will fall outside the models’ range within a few years. …

If, however, temperatures are likely to rise by only 2°C in response to a doubling of carbon emissions (and if the likelihood of a 6°C increase is trivial), the calculation might change. Perhaps the world should seek to adjust to (rather than stop) the greenhouse-gas splurge. There is no point buying earthquake insurance if you do not live in an earthquake zone. In this case more adaptation rather than more mitigation might be the right policy at the margin. …

20130330_STC334_1.png
20130330_STC335_1.png


20130330_STD002_1.jpg



Still think they have a clue what they're talking about?
 
Its cow farts....I'm telling you....believe me.....no other logical explanation.
 
That's it ! Death to the Cows !
Just look at the nerve of some of these Cows.................they must be "Conservative" Cows !
 
Out, Global Warming, In, Climate Change, Out, Climate Change, In, Carbon Pollution.
 
Of course, everyone knows the Sahara desert was a huge lake 25,000 years ago.
Not the first time either.
Seems that the earth has a wobble that causes climate changes.
If you want to protect the planet, change the wobble... 😛
 

Latest posts

Back
Top