Dude and Cal,
I never expect institutions to be perfect; they are full of people. Look at a few of the priests in the Church. Remember the two Jim's - Baker and Swaggart?
Enron and Arthur Anderson, anyone?
I fully understand the concept of a union. I believe the need for them has never been greater since the 30's.
Moreover, I put my time and energy where my mouth is.
I knew NOTHING about the union (except they won the Civil War) until my airline career started. What a wake-up call after the mergers! When the drive to organize began in the 90's, I was there. When they asked for people to stand as stewards, for the 4 years prior to ratification, I was there. When you had to drive 4 hours one-way to attend the lodge meeting, at your own expense, I was there.
There are many things right with the IAM.
There are many things wrong, as well.
I fear the wrongs will relegate the IAM to obscurity at just the time they are needed. That would be a disaster.
From my experience, the IAM is too top-down, too hierarchical, too inside-baseball, and too many secrets. Amazingly, the same behavior they correctly accuse the company of.
They do not involve the membership nearly enough. For example, they have their legislative committees. Do they ever poll the membership, and seek out their views on legislative matters? They do not. And I can tell you from first hand experience - sitting on a legislative committee does not give you a voice. The agenda comes down from the international as marching orders. Period.
The membership needs to control the entire election process, not the district. The 'slate' needs to be relegated to the dustbin. "We hate run-off elections (that is when the 'slate' is challenged) because they are expensive. If the AGC's weren't doing their job, the chairman would get rid of them." That is a direct quote from one of the the senior district types.
I have worked within the system, to no avail. I am certainly on the sh*&list - I did that with eyes wide open.
From my view, there were three options.
Go along, and try to land a cushy job.
Remain mute.
Speak up, and hope improvement occurs.
You'd be amazed at the folks within the IAM hierarchy who realize change is needed, but they are afraid to speak up.
If I can be a catalyst, I will consider that a job well done.
Now if your experience has been satisfactory, good on you.
You can rest assured there are hundreds of agents who feel otherwise.
[post="265757"][/post]