Iraq Collapsing

[EastUS1]

How does one answer a question with a question?

 
Read the various preambles for context first, and per PHX? = Enough said. Whip us out another "Liberty"...umm..."patriotic" tie to best impress, although I'd never dare doubt the war credentials of any AWA "spartan" in the "army of leonidas". 😉

 

[Ms Tree]

So we all agree with Obama pulling out the troops in accordance with the plan set up by Bush and not sending them back? What's the big deal about this thread then?

 

[EastUS1]

So we all agree with Obama pulling out the troops in accordance with the plan set up by Bush and not sending them back? What's the big deal about this thread then?

 
That would be America pulling out troops, unless you're so hopelessly deluded as to honestly imagine that "obama" actually amounts to anything. Our enemies just laugh at that pathetic little pimp. They don't laugh at our soldiers.

 

[PHXConx]

Read the various preambles for context first, and per PHX? = Enough said. Whip us out another "Liberty"...umm..."patriotic" tie to best impress, although I'd never dare doubt the war credentials of any AWA "spartan" in the "army of leonidas". 😉

What?

You couldn't even put the various preambles into context that's why you answered a question with a question..

I don't even know what the rest of the above rambling post was about

 

[KCFlyer]

 
That would be America pulling out troops, unless you're so hopelessly deluded as to honestly imagine that "obama" actually amounts to anything. Our enemies just laugh at that pathetic little pimp. They don't laugh at our soldiers.

No.  They maim and kill our soldiers with IED's.  

 

[PHXConx]

Works for me.

And none of this protracted withdrawals pull them out right now. Yup its going to destabilize whole regions of the globe but they have been artificially stabilized for 70 years. In the long run it will work out.

 

[EastUS1]

No.  They maim and kill our soldiers with IED's.  

 
Indeed they do dear, due to the literally insane rules of engagement. Explain to me how, as a nation, we utterly destroyed the world's 4th largest military in less than 2 months in '91, and ran tanks into B-Dad in no time in 2003, all the while suffering less than many hundreds of casualties....and allowed, yes ALLOWED our precious young to be set up as fodder, to the tune of tragic THOUSANDS KIA? See listings under "politicians"...Your pwecious widdle, murderous o-boy-mama included...?
 
"Be nice"..."embrace diversity"..."respect their culture", and all such infantile, asinine, utter insanity leaves no room for victory...Ever.  On any actual battlefield?...Arabs are a complete joke in this period of history. As fully ALLOWED thugs?...Anyone can kill anyone else, if fully coddled and permitted to do so.

 

[EastUS1]

And none of this protracted withdrawals pull them out right now.

 
Agreed PHX. So long as spineless, pathetic little eunuchs rule DC; there's no point at all in suffering any more brave and decent young Americans dying for such utter scum's "politically correct" insanity...Period! Instead; let's send Joe Biden over. "Buy a shotgun!", or o-boy-mama with some golf clubs. They should be able to alone make all the difference...? 😉 "My" Marine stepson's (one of two Marines of that last title) just finally finished what I want to be his last tour in Afghanistan/the Sandbox/that whole, utterly disgusting cesspool on earth. My sorry self and half a million others were supposedly involved in '91 to ensure that our young needn't later be shedding their blood there.  IMO, the current crop of "politicans" wouldn't even be decent candidates for anything even remotely approaching hygienically acceptable dog food.

 

[Ms Tree]

That would be America pulling out troops, unless you're so hopelessly deluded as to honestly imagine that "obama" actually amounts to anything. Our enemies just laugh at that pathetic little pimp. They don't laugh at our soldiers.

So you want the troops out or not?

 

[EastUS1]

So you want the troops out or not?

 
Do you? No worries that such as your sorry self would ever be included in any "troops" of course:
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2659025/BREAKING-NEWS-Obama-announces-275-US-troops-WILL-sent-Iraq-protect-American-embassy-days-saying-not-return.html
 
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/obama-finally-sends-the-marines-to-libya/
 
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/14/aircraft-carrier-iraq-isis-strike-persian-gulf
 
Shall we take a moment's pause to ride our unicorns now? Explain your "messiah's" actions if you can...?

 

[Ms Tree]

Simple question.  Troops in Iraq or not?  Bush signed an agreement to with draw the troops and Obama abided by the agreement.  

 

[EastUS1]

Simple question.  Troops in Iraq or not?  ....... and Obama abided by the agreement.  

PHXConx, on 17 Jun 2014 - 11:21 PM, said: And none of this protracted withdrawals pull them out right now.
 
"Agreed PHX."
 
"My" Marine stepson's (one of two Marines of that last title) just finally finished what I want to be his last tour in Afghanistan/the Sandbox/that whole, utterly disgusting cesspool on earth. My sorry self and half a million others were supposedly involved in '91 to ensure that our young needn't later be shedding their blood there."
 
No one, I would have thought, could even possibly be as stupid as you're now pretending to be tree, or actually are....I would've hoped anyway, but then; obama's been elected twice, so my notions are clearly wrong there: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2659025/BREAKING-NEWS-Obama-announces-275-US-troops-WILL-sent-Iraq-protect-American-embassy-days-saying-not-return.html
 
I realize this isn't any MENSA meeting, but you could at least pretend yourself to be something above a sea sponge.

 

[Ms Tree]

OK, so you want the troops out.  So what's the issue with Obama pulling out the troops in 2011 per the agreement and not sending troops back in now?

 

[EastUS1]

OK, so you want the troops out.  So what's the issue with Obama pulling out the troops in 2011 per the agreement and not sending troops back in now?

 
 
..."and not sending troops back in now?" Sigh!...Words just fail me here..."But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off,..."
  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2659025/BREAKING-NEWS-Obama-announces-275-US-troops-WILL-sent-Iraq-protect-American-embassy-days-saying-not-return.html

 

[Ms Tree]

Yet you keep rambling on.  So you are saying that troops sent in to protect the embassy are the same as combat troops?  Lol.  That's freaking hilarious. 
 
So you think the embassy should be closed?