Just BASE rate comparison SWA AMFA vs AA TWU

WeAAsles

Veteran
Oct 20, 2007
23,271
5,237
Yesterday on Twitter AMFA came on trying to claim that AMFA AMT’s were making more than TWU AMT’s at AA. Well I decided to look that up for a little accuracy.

Currently AMFA AMT’s TOS earn $50.60 per hour.
TWU AMT’s earn $51.18 per hour.

But the kicker is really in the 401K “Contributions”

AMFA Members at SWA receive ZERO Contribution and have to put in 9.3% to receive a “Match”

TWU Members receive a 5% Contribution and another 4% Match. The Contribution comes with no catches and is automatic.

So that means that a TWU AMT at TOS not counting any extras and just on BASE alone receives $5322.72 more than his AMFA counterpart if he isn’t contributing anything to his Company sponsored 401k account.

ED6794AE-A030-4B99-9AA7-D45B64CB4B8E.jpegE48730C8-6927-4D16-BF58-508C556E5CA1.jpeg
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #2
Taking another look at benefits. Under AMFA a new member has to wait 5 years to gain a 100% match of whatever percentage they put in up to 9.3%

Meanwhile under the TWU/IAM contract at AA members are 100% vested for both the contribution and match after just one year.

73C2E206-0A3C-466C-AD5F-C3E956CBAF54.jpeg40B3F2CC-D70B-49E0-8AB4-C67BAF7C9818.jpeg
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #3
BTW don’t ever try to debate facts with AMFA National on Facebook or Twitter since the only thing they can do to respond is to block everyone who doesn’t support their jargon.

61F897E5-2DB3-466F-B0FF-2FBCFCE947E8.png
 
Taking another look at benefits. Under AMFA a new member has to wait 5 years to gain a 100% match of whatever percentage they put in up to 9.3%

Meanwhile under the TWU/IAM contract at AA members are 100% vested for both the contribution and match after just one year.

View attachment 16806View attachment 16805
We need more comparisons like this, expose the good and the bad of different company contracts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top