Of course you want to discuss the article now. After trashing others for taking the thread off topic even as you did the same.
Where did I say I didn't own what I wrote? I repeatedly have said that I did write what I wrote about the MAT, but you can't seem to accept that I was responding to a comment that someone else made. You then repeated the same outsourcing comment at the MAT that he did, but somehow it is off limits for me to respond to even the first abbreviated comment?
Again, the issue is that you don't want anyone else to criticize anything about the labor movement yet you stand ready to pounce on anyone and then kick, beg, and scream for others to stand by silently while you make your points.
That's not the way the world works. Not here, and not anywhere else. If your ideas are superior, they will stand on their own two feet, Kevin.
If your ideas are lacking - and repeatedly the basis of the labor movement has been shown to be lacking based on its continual decline - then you better look deep into your own soul and figure out how to get on the right side of the the truth.
It isn't someone else's fault, Kevin. It is yours. The sooner you quit lashing out at everyone else and come up with a plan that will allow what you say is so important to you to win, then you might begin to succeed at your goals in life
As for the article, given that there are people who showed up yesterday at the old rate of pay a
nd will show up tomorrow, you can't argue that the only reason pay is being increased is because labor stood up for itself. The market was working and still is. Even without pay raises for contractors that service AA, UA, and B6, there will be people who will come to work for them.
You got the part right about the job market doesn't work on good will. It works by connecting those who want to work with those who need a job.
The government inserted itself into the process, perhaps because of influence from labor and I have no problems with them doing so and in increasing wages in NYC.
But let's also be clear that the wages are going up even though there have been and will continue to do work at lower rates of pay.
DL, perhaps being the most willing to suck up to the government, made the first move. Other companies are willing to fight to keep their costs from going up.
Further, many of these jobs didn't exist years ago. The job functions were middle class jobs with benefits but the number of jobs has increased with deregulation but as new passengers have been added to the system at lower fares, wages for the industry and its support services overall have been reduced.
Finally, as much as anyone might want to argue otherwise, the biggest single factor in limiting the growth of full time benefitted positions in the US right now is ObamaCare. Businesses have consistently said they have no intention of hiring full-time workers if they can hire part-time, non-benefitted positions.
If labor wants to increase the number of full-time benefitted positions in the US, they have to deal with the real roots of why business says they aren't willing to add them.