WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 21,709
- Reaction score
- 10,662
Kevin really isn't of the type that will do Hail or Our Anything - and I wouldn't expect him or anyone else to be something they aren't.
.
But it still doesn't change the fact that it is highly doubtful that any company made a promise that any job classification or location would be unaffected by any corporate downsizing/outsourcing etc... if for no other reason that those statements do have the potential to be legally used against the company - and those types of promises really can't be upheld given the uncertainty of business and the larger economy today.
.
But if someone did hear that kind of statement being made, they should at the very least confront DL leadership who made that statement - but only after seeing a lawyer and preparing a class action suit against the company. There are no shortage of lawyers who would be happy to take the case on if it had merit.
.
What is pretty certain is that alot of PMNW people believed that DL's statements that it would not lay off (not fire, but lay off) full-time personnel meant they were home free in their present positions and locations - but I have never seen DL or any other company make a statement of that kind.
.
I appreciate it, Dawg, for you clarifying what I have asked for several months regarding what is actually happening in MSP. Obviously like everyone else I am disappointed to hear that DL will have no heavy maintenance capabilities in MSP and I don't know why they came to that decision but would like to.
But it also validates that DL after AA is through cutting will likely have the most extensive maintenance operations employing the most mechanics among any US airline - and perhaps the uncertainty of what is happening with AA and its maintenance capabilities and decisions does in fact affect what DL is doing.
For whatever reason, DL took none of Pan Am's maintenance capabilities - and although there wasn't much left of NW's - DL apparently desires to concentrate its heavy scheduled maintenance capabilities in ATL. You and I would think that an airline the size of DL could have more than one heavy maintenance based - but the numbers of global carriers that do so is not terribly long.
.
The argument about outsourcing is valid and has been made... the real question is whether airlines insource and the size of what DL insources is what makes DL distinctive in the industry.
.
DL apparently doesn't need to have ever made a mistake to win the favor of its employees and investors - but it apparently does make a whole lot less mistakes than its competitors - or else the investors who have given DL a $1B plus market cap premium over any other US airline are woefully ignorant and the employees don't realize that they could have it better some other way.
.
But it still doesn't change the fact that it is highly doubtful that any company made a promise that any job classification or location would be unaffected by any corporate downsizing/outsourcing etc... if for no other reason that those statements do have the potential to be legally used against the company - and those types of promises really can't be upheld given the uncertainty of business and the larger economy today.
.
But if someone did hear that kind of statement being made, they should at the very least confront DL leadership who made that statement - but only after seeing a lawyer and preparing a class action suit against the company. There are no shortage of lawyers who would be happy to take the case on if it had merit.
.
What is pretty certain is that alot of PMNW people believed that DL's statements that it would not lay off (not fire, but lay off) full-time personnel meant they were home free in their present positions and locations - but I have never seen DL or any other company make a statement of that kind.
.
I appreciate it, Dawg, for you clarifying what I have asked for several months regarding what is actually happening in MSP. Obviously like everyone else I am disappointed to hear that DL will have no heavy maintenance capabilities in MSP and I don't know why they came to that decision but would like to.
But it also validates that DL after AA is through cutting will likely have the most extensive maintenance operations employing the most mechanics among any US airline - and perhaps the uncertainty of what is happening with AA and its maintenance capabilities and decisions does in fact affect what DL is doing.
For whatever reason, DL took none of Pan Am's maintenance capabilities - and although there wasn't much left of NW's - DL apparently desires to concentrate its heavy scheduled maintenance capabilities in ATL. You and I would think that an airline the size of DL could have more than one heavy maintenance based - but the numbers of global carriers that do so is not terribly long.
.
The argument about outsourcing is valid and has been made... the real question is whether airlines insource and the size of what DL insources is what makes DL distinctive in the industry.
.
DL apparently doesn't need to have ever made a mistake to win the favor of its employees and investors - but it apparently does make a whole lot less mistakes than its competitors - or else the investors who have given DL a $1B plus market cap premium over any other US airline are woefully ignorant and the employees don't realize that they could have it better some other way.