" Repeal and Replace " ????

[cltrat]

No he wasn’t you’re the typical liberal think you know everything and what’s best for everyone when in reality you couldn’t find your a$$ with a gps

 

[xUT]

Trump is a moving target.
Who can trust 'anything' he says?
He was for it, then he was against it and will probably be for it tomorrow.
He is the most 'consistently' inconsistent POTUS we have ever had.
Yes, he embarrasses me as I voted for him.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Just watching from the sidelines - DTSP is correct. While some of your paycheck is earmarked for social security and medicare....it's going to pay your PARENTS and their generations money. Just like your kid and my kid will have money in their paychecks earmarked for social security and medicare will go to pay for OURS. No matter how you cut it, it's pretty socialistic. Except that OUR kids most likely won't see any of the money THEY had earmarked...we will have spent it all.

Cut the crap. Social Security should be flush with cash. The only reason it is broke is government IOU's.

 

[KCFlyer]

Cut the crap. Social Security should be flush with cash. The only reason it is broke is government IOU's.

Should be, but thanks to "trickle down economics", the money from your payroll tax increase in the 80's...something that was SUPPOSED to "save" Social Security....never saw the SS fund. It went to the general fund to "prove" trickle down worked. And it doesn't change the fact that they money YOU will get will be money that SOMEONE ELSE paid in. In case you forgot....that was a republican idea...and republicans are loathe to do ANYTHING socialist....like "social" security. Geez....it's got the word in it's name.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Should be, but thanks to "trickle down economics", the money from your payroll tax increase in the 80's...something that was SUPPOSED to "save" Social Security....never saw the SS fund. It went to the general fund to "prove" trickle down worked. And it doesn't change the fact that they money YOU will get will be money that SOMEONE ELSE paid in. In case you forgot....that was a republican idea...and republicans are loathe to do ANYTHING socialist....like "social" security. Geez....it's got the word in it's name.

Again, Social Security would be flush with cash if the government would keep their damn hands out of it.

Social Security needed to be "saved" because of theft.

That is why there was a move to privatize Social Security, to keep the governments damn hands off our money.

What part of this simple concept do you not understand?

 

[cltrat]

Again, Social Security would be flush with cash if the government would keep their damn hands out of it.

Social Security needed to be "saved" because of theft.

That is why there was a move to privatize Social Security, to keep the governments damn hands off our money.

What part of this simple concept do you not understand?

.

Oh he understands he just feels the need to point out that in his opinion republicans are entirely responsible for it

 

[KCFlyer]

Again, Social Security would be flush with cash if the government would keep their damn hands out of it.

Social Security needed to be "saved" because of theft.

That is why there was a move to privatize Social Security, to keep the governments damn hands off our money.

What part of this simple concept do you not understand?

Actually, Social Security wasn't doing too terribly bad until the Republicans had to "save" it. They cut taxes...trickle down wasn't working...the general fund was short, so they raised the payroll tax and scared America into thinking that SS was in dire straits. None of that money ever say the social security fund - it was diverted to the general fund -thus beginning the era of "theft". And as you all like to say when it comes to NAFTA and the Gramm Leach Bliley bill...all republican ideas that damn near killed the country..."look who signed it". So yeah....I blame republicans.

 

[xUT]

Yea, let's privatize SS, that will fix it... LOL
Ever hear of ENRON?

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

Just watching from the sidelines - DTSP is correct. While some of your paycheck is earmarked for social security and medicare....it's going to pay your PARENTS and their generations money. Just like your kid and my kid will have money in their paychecks earmarked for social security and medicare will go to pay for OURS. No matter how you cut it, it's pretty socialistic. Except that OUR kids most likely won't see any of the money THEY had earmarked...we will have spent it all.

Sorry KCF, but I respectfully DIGRESS. Your offspring WILL see her/his SS that is currently being paid into.

To think otherwise, is to buy into the CREATOR'S of the REAL Fake news.
Namely the G D ... GOP !

 

[cltrat]

first of all smart guy I'm pretty sure it would be respectfully disagree not digress and only a jackass would put it in cap unless you're yelling at your boy KC.

as too the fake news GOP comment , lmao! thks for the morning laugh keep watching CNN they'll never steer you wrong
hahahahahahaahahahaahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!