What's new

Rotor Rpm Vs Vne

!!!!! HORNS !!!!!!! What the hell are horns doing on a 61???? Do they fall off in the winter like they do on a moose? I've never seen horns on a 61. Come to think of it, never heard any ether. :unsure:

twitch
 
Cyclic-Monkey (here's a banana for you! 😀 )

I have a friend who managed to HOT START a Bell 407, and ruin the engine, even with FADEC!!

And yeah, it sees to be what I thought it was then... :wacko:
 
Nice bird Twitch!

I think the only horn on a '61 must be the "LOW COFFEE HORN"!! :up:
 
Winnie, are you sure that he was only "Starting" it? That FADEC system has a lot of protection against such an event ever happening?
One of our big problems is starting at High Altitude -High OAT- High Residual MGT (Measured Gas Temperature), then throw in a downwind component, and you're not going to get a start...... It will shut down the start if the MGT even gets near start limits or if it deems the start acceleration may get near limits.
 
I love how this forum wanders off topic.........

Winnie, they only time I heard of a 407 cooking it's engine on start-up was because the pilot started it in MANUAL mode, not AUTO. Therefore there was no FADEC protection for the engine. The FADEC can cover the pilot's butt from many screw-ups, but only if it is turned on !!

This case would be the same as taking a Long-Ranger's throttle to the idle position, and then touching the starter !!!!! ( Houston, we have ignition, AND a problem).

The pilot involved in this situation is well known and respected in this business (just like 407Driver, but it wasn't him), he admitted his error, felt terrible about it, and should remain nameless.

The 407 is a good machine, admittedly it has had a few problems, but this one was not the aircraft's fault.

Now back to the topic........some 407s can be switched down to 90% Rotor speed to provide a quieter noise signature. I have never flown one with this kit. If anyone has...what happens to the VNE limits ???
This would be interesting because, as many of you know, the blades of a 407 spin very fast at 100%, and the machine has a real kick-arse cruise speed and can easily reach its VNE of 140 knots if you lower the nose a little.

(CTD, are you back online yet, do you know?)
 
The feller I know who did it was in California, so noone here mentioned. And thanks for the information as well!!


Now for the event,
The Gander Air Show 2003, I shall presently go out and drool over Shark 441, my alltime favourite, the Sea King, and the super kitten from Cougar will be up as well.
See ya :up:
 
Well you all missed it!

Good show and perfect 32 degre day in Gander!
 
The 'beeping down' of the N2 has a valid purpose on some machines. All of this has come from the Vietnam era Hueys (NOT including the 212's) and led to some confusion about 'beeping down the N2'. Whatever the case, one should know when to do so and do it carefully and slowly as it is putting more strain on certain systems. It can be a way of reducing EGT and N1 on a hot day. The wind/breeze 45 degrees to the right of the nose, a 'beep down' to 97%-98% and a little right rudder as she 'augers out' can keep her performing well for a number of occasions. Done all the time.......well ya better find another spot to sling from or lessen the load. The bad side of that ability is it's mis-use. That same aircraft will get airborne with horrendously overgross loads on a cold winter day. The intention 'combat-wise' was to provide an area for one to go into to save one's ass........not to sling 10 drums, instead of 8, just to impress the customer. If you had to go into the N2 range all the time then it was only a matter of time before you went home to 'the World' in a zip-up body bag because it meant you were 'pushing your luck'.
 
Outwest said:
Cyclic M......thanks for the info, you may not be a Math major but you are light years ahead of my cyphering. Following your numbers, would you not be able to INCREASE your vne. The retreating blade would be going that much faster no? Hence stall later? Great stuff, thanks again
Going back to the original question it is my understanding that Vne exists because of the blade angles on the retreating blade. It is ture that the retreating balde would be going faster however this results in greater separation of air and a lower useful angle of attack. This is why retreating blade stall starts at the tip and moves in. The faster tip of the blade has a smaller useful range of angles to create lift. As the speed increases the useful angle of attack decreases until it reaches a breaking point...stall. This is also complicated by the advancing blade and the nasty vibrations and structural limitations related to the blade.
I do agree with Cyclic Monkey though...SLOW DOWN...WAY DOWN. :up:
 
:huh: I think that cyclic monkeys view on NR vs VNE is bang on ! His thoughts 0n NR and its effects on LTE are exactly how it was described to me by FlightSafety. It might be a stretch, but those limits that are posted in the flight manual are there for a reason. Somebody with a lot of time, money, and experience has played with these limitaions ( Company Test Pilots). My own personal experince has shown me that when NR decays, LTE does occur and the more you pull the worse it get's. Lowering the collective is a hard thing to do, when cumulo granite is rushing the cockpit. In my humble opinion, regardless of which helicopter you're flying, always know your limits as well as those of the aircraft. :afro:
 
if you cannot lift it at 100%, then you sure as hell should not be trying to lift it at say 97 or 98%. <_< <_< <_< at least not with an aircraft that i own!!!

so Big Duke, speaking of lifting. was the twin pac able to launch that aluminium fly tank FULL of jet A this summer? did the tank get smaller or its contents reduced? 😛
 
:lol: Vert-Ref, Not to get off topic but the boys in green and gold don't use fly tanks, our production speaks for it's self. The NR vs LTE was in regards to ski operations. Thank GOD for powder landings. :up: B)
 
so i guess you could'nt lift it eh? 😉 😀 😀

you will have to tell me about that production over coffee some day! :up: when you all going sking?


my first comment was in agreement with what cap said...i think!
 
cyclic monkey - the quiet cruise is there because the 407 can actually fly quite happily at lower RPM - they apparently were increased to suit customer demand. Memory escapes me as to what the limits were (you weren't supposed to have it on below about 200 feet, I think), but it certainly reduced the noise complaints at the Falls. Not quite Blue Thunder!

Phil
 

Latest posts

Back
Top