Cosmo
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 840
- Reaction score
- 0
So what''s the problem? ACA operates 88 CRJs and about 30 J41s for United at ORD and IAD, providing a substantial portion of the major''s feed at ORD and nearly all of it at IAD. ACA''s pilots have agreed to a somewhat lower salary structure, contingent upon a renewed agreement with United. And many of ACA''s flights operate in the crowded northeastern part of the U.S., an area where operating costs are often higher than elsewhere in the country.
Given these facts, I would assume that the two parties can''t be that far apart regarding the new contract''s terms. I''m also assuming that United realizes that costs really are higher in the northeast and that it can''t replace all of ACA''s 118 aircraft very quickly (the Mesa deal was for many fewer aircraft and could also be aimed at Air Wisconsin, United''s highest-cost regional feeder). But I could also be wrong regarding one or more of the above assumptions, so any insight that others could provide would be appreciated.
Here''s the ACA press release issued this morning, noting that discussions on June 30 produced no agreement acceptable to ACA.
Given these facts, I would assume that the two parties can''t be that far apart regarding the new contract''s terms. I''m also assuming that United realizes that costs really are higher in the northeast and that it can''t replace all of ACA''s 118 aircraft very quickly (the Mesa deal was for many fewer aircraft and could also be aimed at Air Wisconsin, United''s highest-cost regional feeder). But I could also be wrong regarding one or more of the above assumptions, so any insight that others could provide would be appreciated.
Here''s the ACA press release issued this morning, noting that discussions on June 30 produced no agreement acceptable to ACA.