dear "lets kill a muslim" crew,
recently, some al qaeda muslims destroyed a revered mosque in iraq (sunni muslims destroying shi'ite muslim holy place)
three points:
1) if a muslim destroys another muslim's mosque, you will immediately claim that this was a 'good' muslim. yet, if a baptist destroyed a methodist's church, you will immediately claim that person was a "fake" christian! why the different treatment? (i am not arguing that that type of christian is a "true" christian, i am suggesting you use a similar standard).
2) if a muslim destroys another muslim's mosque, you will immediately claim that this was a 'sane' muslim. yet, if a baptist destroyed a methodist's church, you will immediately claim that person was insane. you would say, it is unchristian-like for someone to blowup a methodist church and thus they must be crazy. why is it not 'crazy' for a muslim to blowup another muslim site? afterall, the differences between sunnis and shi'ites are as trivial as between methodists and baptists.
3) if a muslim destroys another muslim's mosque, you will immediately claim that this is representative of ALL muslims. yet, if a christian does something like that, not only are they not christian, but you claim it is an immediate outlier and not a representation at all.
listen here, if ALL muslims were out to get the west, dont you think things would be much worse? there are more than a billion muslims in the world, they would be kicking major a$$ if ALL muslims were wanting to kill you. there are bad people, the fight is against them.
YOU ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN THOSE THAT ALSO BRING A MESSAGE OF HATE!
awaiting your "lets kill muslims" before they kill us speech.
