What's new

Teamsters Lm2

700UW

Corn Field
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
37,637
Reaction score
19,369
Location
NC
Teamsters LM2

James Hoffa for the year 2004 $291,838.00

Thomas Keegel $283,677.00

Giacomo Cipriani $157.282.00

Robert Bouvier $144,905.00

Tyson Johnson $200,731.00

Walter Lytle $153,494.00

Ralph Taurone $149.381.00

Philip Young $171,850.00

Richard Bell $180,096.00 Executive Assistant to the GST

Harry Dellinger $162,015 Admin Asst to the GST

Charles Harple $168,230.00

Cheryl Johnson $169,389.00





Shall I continue?
 
Teamsters LM2

James Hoffa for the year 2004 $291,838.00

Thomas Keegel $283,677.00

Giacomo Cipriani $157.282.00

Robert Bouvier $144,905.00

Tyson Johnson $200,731.00

Walter Lytle $153,494.00

Ralph Taurone $149.381.00

Philip Young $171,850.00

Richard Bell $180,096.00 Executive Assistant to the GST

Harry Dellinger $162,015 Admin Asst to the GST

Charles Harple $168,230.00

Cheryl Johnson $169,389.00
Shall I continue?

What's your point Mr. 700? Buy the way how many members does the IAM have? I'm talking about dues paying members.
🙂
 
The point is, an earlier post listed the IAM LM2, and there were subsequent suggestions the compensation was untoward.

It is certainly fair game and appropriate to post the same Teamsters information, so that members can make a factual, apples-to-apples comparision.

It appears the Teamster leadership is as well compensated as IAM.

Whether that is right or wrong is open to discussion, but now we have facts to debate.
 
The point is, an earlier post listed the IAM LM2, and there were subsequent suggestions the compensation was untoward.

It is certainly fair game and appropriate to post the same Teamsters information, so that members can make a factual, apples-to-apples comparision.

It appears the Teamster leadership is as well compensated as IAM.

Whether that is right or wrong is open to discussion, but now we have facts to debate.

I agree. Post please.
 
It is posted, read the topic starter and click on the link provided.
 
The point is, an earlier post listed the IAM LM2, and there were subsequent suggestions the compensation was untoward.

It is certainly fair game and appropriate to post the same Teamsters information, so that members can make a factual, apples-to-apples comparision.

It appears the Teamster leadership is as well compensated as IAM.

Whether that is right or wrong is open to discussion, but now we have facts to debate.

I think they are all paid to much. Including the CEO's of the former AWA and US Airways. They are paid too much for what they do. This does not influence my preference of representation.
 
Well, I agree with that, but Teamster leadership is feeding out of the same trough the IAM leadership is.

Both unions are nowhere near democratic enough, in that the membership can easily effect leadership change. Remember Teamsters for a Democratic Union?

IMHO, BOTH are in need of reform. I speak of personal experience with the IAM, and research into IBT.

That goal is on the horizon: the HP/US situation is right in front of you now.

You are in a bind. I feel the IBT is the better representative long-term, but the IAM has a better contract (scope) now. Don't deceive yourself - management is going to exploit this division and any contract weaknesses. They have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders - they have NO responsibility to you.

My advise from the beginning. Take independent action. Take up a collection on the floor. Hire an independent labor attorney, and carry all IAM/IBT documents to him. Get his opinion. Act accordingly.

Sounds expensive? If 200 guys pony up $50 each, that's 10,000 dollars - that ought to buy an authoratative opinion. And if you can't organize 200 guys for $50, you're doomed, anyway.

Sounds expensive? How expensive will it get if you don't act?
 
Teamsters LM2

James Hoffa for the year 2004 $291,838.00

Thomas Keegel $283,677.00

Giacomo Cipriani $157.282.00

Robert Bouvier $144,905.00

Tyson Johnson $200,731.00

Walter Lytle $153,494.00

Ralph Taurone $149.381.00

Philip Young $171,850.00

Richard Bell $180,096.00 Executive Assistant to the GST

Harry Dellinger $162,015 Admin Asst to the GST

Charles Harple $168,230.00

Cheryl Johnson $169,389.00
Shall I continue?


How about Duane Woerth? I know he still parks his Navigator and Town Car in the Mass. Ave garage. Is he still making over $400K with the free house and unlimited expense account?
 
Hoffa Adds Top Fat Cat to 2006 Slate

October 19, 2005. Do you recognize this Teamster fat cat?

He is our union's highest paid official at $345,408.

He inherited his local from his brother and father—a member of the Chicago mob, according to a report issued by Hoffa’s former anti-corruption czar Ed Stier.

He is under an FBI investigation for alleged kickbacks and fraud involving a Teamster dental plan.
And he's the newest member of the Hoffa Slate.

Story

Patronage or Teamster Power?
Study shows multiple salaries at heart of Hoffa patronage scheme.

October 19, 2005. Each year, the Teamster Rank & File Education and Legal Defense Foundation (TRF) conducts a comprehensive analysis of Teamster financial documents and officer compensation.

Convoy Dispatch publishes the results in our annual $100,000 Club issue.

This year, the study focuses on the record number of super-compensated Teamster officials—making $150,000, $200,000 or more—who are on the International Union payroll.

Our $100,000 Club analyzes how the Hoffa administration is using members' dues money in a political patronage scheme—by guaranteeing multiple salaries to a network of political allies.

A total of 148 officials on Hoffa's payroll get multiple salaries. This figure has skyrocketed by 722 percent since Hoffa took office.

Our study also examines the growing salary gap between these super-compensated officials and the majority of local union principal officers who make $86,000 a year or less.

Is all of our dues money being used like it should to fight corporate greed and build union power? Or is some going for patronage and pork? We provide the data and let you decide.

Story
 
That actually sounds a lot like the tactics of our government. The increase in pay of any of the people that are around an organization like that is bound to have the "good ol boy" type of payroll. Stop and think about it, the CEO's are the same way. They surround themselves with their friends and pay them well. They get Million dollar plus bonuses. Unions are a business like anything else in the financial world. We can stand and wonder over the unreal salaries or we can tend to the situation at hand.
 
Well, I agree with that, but Teamster leadership is feeding out of the same trough the IAM leadership is.

Both unions are nowhere near democratic enough, in that the membership can easily effect leadership change. Remember Teamsters for a Democratic Union?

IMHO, BOTH are in need of reform. I speak of personal experience with the IAM, and research into IBT.

That goal is on the horizon: the HP/US situation is right in front of you now.

You are in a bind. I feel the IBT is the better representative long-term, but the IAM has a better contract (scope) now. Don't deceive yourself - management is going to exploit this division and any contract weaknesses. They have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders - they have NO responsibility to you.

My advise from the beginning. Take independent action. Take up a collection on the floor. Hire an independent labor attorney, and carry all IAM/IBT documents to him. Get his opinion. Act accordingly.

Sounds expensive? If 200 guys pony up $50 each, that's 10,000 dollars - that ought to buy an authoratative opinion. And if you can't organize 200 guys for $50, you're doomed, anyway.

Sounds expensive? How expensive will it get if you don't act?
The above suggestion is the best I've seen yet. It's time for some real "solidarity" and both sides make our union put up or shut up! Maybe then we have a chance at getting what we want from the company.
 
I wish to God fleet service had done this PRIOR to union representation vote.

Maybe then, over 40 'class II' cities would still have their jobs.

Bottom line - ANY UNION WILL BS YOU.

Get independent facts to make your decision.

Independent from the company, the IAM or the IBT.
 
I wish to God fleet service had done this PRIOR to union representation vote.

Maybe then, over 40 'class II' cities would still have their jobs.

Bottom line - ANY UNION WILL BS YOU.

Get independent facts to make your decision.

Independent from the company, the IAM or the IBT.
The IAM kept catering in PHL

QUOTE(diogenes @ Oct 23 2005, 04:18 PM)
"You are in a bind. I feel the IBT is the better representative long-term, but the IAM has a better contract (scope) now. Don't deceive yourself - management is going to exploit this division and any contract weaknesses. They have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders - they have NO responsibility to you."
This is why CWA-IBT agents did a alliance will it work time will tell


An alliance between CWA at US Airways, and Teamsters at America West, is best for the job security, standard of living and working conditions of passenger service employees at both airlines.
The lack of an alliance would be dangerous for agents at both airlines...
With the airline industry in chaos, and employees suffering cuts at every airline, agents at US Airways and America West cannot afford an antagonistic conflict against each other that would risk our salaries, our protections and our benefits.
We have worked out an alliance which will preserve the US Airways agents' CWA contract, their CWA locals and their access to information and participation in their union.
The alliance (called Association of Airline Passenger Service Employees IBT + CWA) will allow us to remain CWA members while the America West employees remain Teamster members. US Airways agents will remain protected by the terms and conditions of their CWA contract.
In the future, the goal is to bring the AWA salaries and conditions up to the CWA contract level, and to improve aspects of the CWA contract (for example: activate our "snap backs" sooner for holidays, vacation, sickdays, premiums, etc.). We eventually want a single, improved contract protecting the entire passenger service group.
When that future, single, contract is achieved, the Teamster agents in eastern stations would be CWA-represented. The CWA agents in western stations would be Teamster-represented. The Alliance will allow us to work in a concerted effort to resolve major contract issues that would affect all members, regardless of location. But that is in the future. For now US Airways agents, East and West, remain protected by their CWA contract.
Those are big goals and we can accomplish them by working together for a united passenger service group.
For the good of our careers, for the good of our new airline, it makes sense to form an alliance between the two work groups that maintains their current representation and contract (US Airways/CWA) and status quo conditions (AWA/Teamsters).
For that reason we recommend and request that you approve this Alliance when you receive your ballot and Alliance proposal in the mail.
Thank You,
CWA US Airways Local Presidents
 
700 Please get a life, I havent sent a card in but with your constant moronic comments, I am thinking about it. Please go empty a lav, spend time with your kid do something that will give the rest of us a break. You send more people away from the IAM than you can imagine so please...... How about a nice cup of shut the @!&% up.
Have a nice day 🙂
 

Latest posts

Back
Top