What's new

The Blind Leading The Stupid!

SharkBait, I guess you are not as old as moi.
The 47G was the first Bell that I know of that had hydraulics.
The 47D1 had irreversables (no hydraulics), we had one at Viking in the early days. It was fun to fly. Identical to the "Mash 47D1's."
If you really want to develope a strong left arm try flying a Vertol H-21 when the collective is out of rig.

Cheers,Don
 
Geez blackmac - a H21 - that is the first Helicopter I ever saw. Was that You??? 😀
Actually we had a 47G at Canadore in 1976 and I recall that the Hyd. system was not as good as the G-2. and I recall you really felt some feedback in the controls - could be wrong - Long time ago. Underpowered little critter too ( Franklin (SP?) engine) Auto Al and I nearly dumped it in the trees trying to get out of a hole 1 fine day. Big leap in the learning curve that day ( still have a mild concussion from Al's clipboard - which is why helmets were mandatory ) Someone rolled it over in a hole NE of YYB later that winter so that was that. C-FSCJ I think.
Thanks for your reply. Always interesting. :up:
 
VR:

I said it has less to do with disc loading and more to do with lock number which is derived using the dimensions of the blade itself and the load put on it. That is why the B blades are more susceptable to it. As far as disc loading the B and B2 have the same disc loading at 4300 lbs but you take your B to 10 grand on a windy day and try to cruise at max cont. hang on. Plus at higher altitudes the pitch on blades is higher for same torque setting thus imposing a greater load to the hydraulic system which is why it is more easily encountered at altitude.

There is a blurb in the book "the art and science of flying a helicopter" on lock number, makes it easier for us simple folk.

CTD:

I have towed a bird in the rocks with BA and never got close to ST, yes you are doing hard manuevers but at lower airspeeds(80 kts and less) and thus the blades/hyd aren't overloaded. Have done lots of high altitude slinging and production skiiing but the most have encountered ST is sightseeing in level flight at max continuous power in gusty wind conditions. Why sightseeing, well we would climb up to 12000 feet to go and sometimes enroute it got windy. Heliskiing doesn't normally have you trekking across the sky in level flight as often.

I also encountered it while pulling out of high speed descent as used to from Gazelle days and woke me up.

SB;

We used to train the same way but I feel that since you have to put the a/c through a relatively high load with only two people in it to encounter ST that was not getting the message to the pilots. What we did was to brief the pilot on the maneuver and while flying at 80 kts turn off the hydraulics on collectve, wait for the pilot to lower collective slightly then turn them back on. Would work up to 100 kt doing same manueaver, and was an good way to show the feedback associated to ST.

It is also referred to as jack stall, and there has been much written about it in the US.

It is a bit hard to get some pilots head around the fact that you don't have to be pulling any G's to get into ST it is just that most a/c will be flown at lower altitudes and probably encounter ST more by being flown overly aggressive. The reassuring thing about ST in turbulence is that once the blades are unloaded slightly it goes away, many times before I could even lower the collective. But a few months in the rockies or coastal range will be enough experience to enlighten most.

In my experience the bigger blades on BA,1,2 are much better and would assume the same with B3, although wonder about being over 6000 lbs with external load in windy day.

Magseal, imagine your hand out the window doing 40 kmhr and feeling the aerodynamic forces then go to 120 kmhr and do the same. No G force difference only higher load on arm, g force would be felt by body being flung out on road when door opens. Ha, ha.

I need hockey fix aaaaaaaaaaaaaaah. GO FLAMES GO.

Thats better.
sc

:up:
 
Skullcap, you're right of course. The only thing that confuses me (about this :unsure: ) is that the only time I've personally seen it, I was doing 60 kts towing a snowmobile. I had a good buddy who was putting off an impromtu airshow at a camp where we both worked, and got into it at the top of a layover turn at virtually zero airspeed.
 
CTD;

Odd at that low a/s, was is turbulent, if doing 60 were you pullling max continuos?

The airshow problem, could have been inputting mucho t/r thus using up all the hyd capacity, as the fm says not to complete 360 pedul turn in less than 6 sec.

Have heard of pilot experiencing st in hover due to harsh t/r handling at high DA's.

sc
 
We have a B, BA and a B2. I find that any feeback is allways felt in the B. What is it about the blue blades? If you were to load the B to 4300 lbs and go to 8000 feet, you'll get feedback sooner than you would expect, no hotdogging. That being said I've never had jack stall in the BA or B2 with ops up to 10 000.
As far as the V belt mod, bring it on, the one that is being used now is just not enough. That being said, if Ontario gets to choose how we operate out AC, I'd like only 105 lb cute chick firefighters. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Oh ya, hey everybody, I quit my position at Blackcomb, I'm moving over to Skyline. B2 and 212. It's the crazy season. :up:
 
Hello CTD..
Sorry there bud,but Iv just got to ask ya.Were ya towing that sled or was ya slinging it?????????????? :shock:
Have a super weekend Mini....
 

Latest posts

Back
Top