As long as I can remember, pol's line up and crow about how the SS trust fund is viable it has enough to cover all payouts.
Looks like its bullcrap.
From my most cherished and valued media source, NYT:
Not to worry though, they were only off by a mere 800 billion.
And with all this, Obama had the audacity of dropping the payroll tax by 2%, for what?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/opinion/sunday/social-security-its-worse-than-you-think.html?_r=1&
Looks like its bullcrap.
From my most cherished and valued media source, NYT:
In the first presidential debate, Mr. Obama described Social Security as “structurally sound,” and Mitt Romney said that “neither the president nor I are proposing any changes” to the program. It was a rare issue on which both men agreed — and both were utterly wrong.
Not to worry though, they were only off by a mere 800 billion.
What’s not is that the Social Security Administration underestimates how long Americans will live and how much the trust funds will need to pay out — to the tune of $800 billion by 2031, more than the current annual defense budget — and that the trust funds will run out, if nothing is done, two years earlier than the government has predicted.
And with all this, Obama had the audacity of dropping the payroll tax by 2%, for what?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/opinion/sunday/social-security-its-worse-than-you-think.html?_r=1&