MCI transplant
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2003
- Messages
- 5,311
- Reaction score
- 584
Excuse me? On one hand your crying about the oil companies making money, and on the other, you ask about them selling their oil at a lose! Now, which is it? You can't have it both ways! But I'll ask anyway. What is wrong with American oil Companies making money? The oil supply out here is going to be bought, and used anyway, so why not have that revinue $$$ come to us instead of OPEC? Yes, they could cut theis production, but it's a new day now! Between the U.S. and Canada, we now have the potental resources to trump OPEC. What I've suggested would not put any U.S.troops on the ground. But I do agee with you and feel that Europe could be doing more.Ms Tree said:I was not aware that the US drilled for oil. Exactly what oil company does the US government run? Point being that oil companies are drilling for oil to make money. Do you want to subsidize the oil companies even more than we are now? Selling it at a loss tends to be bad for business. OPEC could drop their production to keep prices up (they like to make money too) so pardon me if I do not think it is quite that easy.
I do not think threatening a Psycho with conflict is a good idea. To me the question is, is Crimea actually worth US solders lives? Personally, I do not think so. If Europe is concerned, let them put some skin in the game for a change. We can stand behind them. No need for the US to be in the forefront every time. We see how well it worked in Afghanistan and Iraq and ... the list is long.