What's new

This should improve Hillary's chances in 2016...

I doubt that Monica's resurgence is a coincidence.

But the news coming out in the Daily Beast today certainly isn't a squirrel. Talk about a war on women...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/05/07/hillary-s-state-department-refused-to-brand-boko-haram-as-terrorists.html
 
What Clinton didn’t mention was that her own State Department refused to place Boko Haram on the list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the U.N. headquarters in Abuja. The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen senators and congressmen.

In May 2012, then-Justice Department official Lisa Monaco (now at the White House) wrote to the State Department to urge Clinton to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization. The following month, Gen. Carter Ham, the chief of U.S. Africa Command, said that Boko Haram provided a “safe haven” for al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and was likely sharing explosives and funds with the group. And yet, Hillary Clinton’s State Department still declined to place Boko Haram on its official terrorist roster.
This happened about the same time that Chris Stevens and others were pushing for higher security resources in Libya.
 
10291240_10152149603001275_7008880787557444565_n.jpg

 
 
southwind said:
"BENGHAZI"!
 
And, at least 5 of those attacks were in countries that the Bush Administration (and admittedly some Democratic administrations from the past) were insisting were allies of the U.S.--Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.  AFAIK, not one of those allies rounded up any suspects or perpetrators.
 
delldude said:
 
Got a link to the coverups from each of those attacks?
anything to kiss the D ass esp ol lady Clinton the only shot to keep the WH in ,16
 
politifake?? sounds reliable to me and you libs talk about Fox  lol
 
What happened it Beirut is reality.
 
time_31_oct_1983.jpg

 
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/05/ronald-reagans-benghazi.html
 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/nation/2013/10/23/marines-beirut-lebanon-hezbollah/3171593/
 
(CNN) -- Here is a look at what you need to know about the 1983 bombing at a Marine compound in Beirut Lebanon that killed 241 U.S. service personnel.
 
October 23, 2013 marks the 30th anniversary of the bombing.
 
Facts:
October 23, 1983 - 241 U.S. service personnel, 220 Marines and 21 other service personnel, are killed by a truck bomb at a Marine compound in Beirut, Lebanon.

 
300 service members had been living at the four-story building at the airport in Beirut. There were 1,800 Marines stationed in Beirut at the time.
 
A multi-national force with units from France, Italy and the United Kingdom is also on peacekeeping duty in Lebanon at the same time.
 
At the same time the Marine barracks is hit, a suicide bomber drives a pickup truck full of explosives and crashes into a building housing French paratroopers. Approximately 58 French soldiers are killed in the attack.
 
This is the most deadly attack against U.S. Marines since the battle over Iwo Jima in February 1945.
The bombing is traced to Hezbollah, a militant and political group that originated in Lebanon in 1982. Iranian and Syrian involvement was also suspected.
 
The Marines are criticized for having lax security at the barracks.
 
The commander of the barracks, Col. Timothy J. Geraghty, says in congressional hearings investigating the attacks that the compound was hard to defend because it was on flat ground and vehicles drove by it daily to access the airport.
 
Timeline:
1982 - President Ronald Reagan sends Marines to Lebanon on a peacekeeping mission.

October 23, 1983 - At 6:22 am, a truck carrying 2000 pounds of explosives drives into the Marine compound in Beirut, Lebanon and crashes into the 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regimental Battalion Landing Team barracks.
February 1984 - U.S. troops withdraw from Lebanon.
1985 - The Inman Report is released. It finds that Marine officers did not take proper steps to protect the barracks against terrorist attacks.
May 30, 2003 - A U.S. federal judge ruled that the terrorist group Hezbollah carried out the attack at the direction of the Iranian government. The ruling allowed families of the victims to sue Iran.
September 7, 2007 - U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth orders Iran to pay more than $2.6 billion to survivors and family members.
March 1, 2010 - A lawsuit is filed in New York City seeking to force Iran to pay the $2.6 billion awarded to survivors and family members in 2007.
March 30, 2012 - U.S. District Court judge Royce Lamberth issues a judgment against Iran of $2.1 billion, to be paid to the families and survivors of the attack.
 
 
whatever happened there doesnt excuse your boy, ever heard two wrongs doesnt , make a right
 
Funny Republicans are quiet about Bush and Reagan where more people were killed in attacks under them than in Libya.
 
I'm sure those will be great talking points in both the mid term and 16 elections.
of course there's that big albatross obamacare that's going to win elections across the country for democrats.
 
Ms Tree said:
How is a supposed security laps a war on women?
You can actually stay with a straight face that not labeling as terrorists a group who just kidnapped almost 300 young girls has nothing to do with women, and is just a security lapse?...
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
Oh, so it's the cover up that matters now, not the people who died? Just tryin'ta keep up.
 
Considering that a cover-up is what got Nixon impeached (and a cover-up also got Don Carty fired), yes, I'd say holding people accountable for cover-ups matters.

Lying to the families about how their loved ones were left to die certainly matters.

Deliberately lying to the public to preserve the President's image two months before an election is despicable.
 
Back
Top