TWU in Philly

[delldude]

Dell if this is truely your attitude on this incedent then you are not the person I thought you to be. If that is the case then I wish to retract my statement that I would like to meet you some day, I do not wish to waste my time with you if that is the case. Now everyone can see why my preference is decert to IAM. There is no room for that mentality in our chosen field.
VOTE IBT / TWU

due process is the law of the land not public lynchings as we have here on this forum.
this board is rampant with speculation, little if any factual coverage except 2 or 3 places and they all quote the same press release/statement which i have posted.

There is no room for that mentality in our chosen field.

i hear you but you should research the same type of acts from the union you hold so dear.its quite rampant to this day.

 

[NeedForSpeed]

due process is the law of the land not public lynchings as we have here on this forum.

Dude, I respectfully disagree. ....there are no "public lynchings" hapenning on this thread, IMHO. Just people saying that the law should be followed, and that is, assault is a CRIME.....GOOD DAY, PAL <_<

 

[barbeetantrums]

"Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the U. S. Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages.

When the U. S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. Some have said this provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before indictment."

 

[hp_fa]

"Under RICO," ...

Barbee, I am wondering about your mentioning RICO. Has the US Attorney's Office made any comment about that, or is it just a possibility you potentially foresee?

 

[muircross]

w/o crediblle witness' its hearsay until proven.
looks like the goodfellows from IAM gave fair warning....and the IAM officials will probably be exonerated by this:

Dell, weren't Marriot's kitchen staff privy to some of the activity, and if so, were there any statements from the staff?
Thanks.

 

[Bob Owens]

Has anybody heard who the 5 organizers for the TWU were in Philly? It seems to be a well kept secret.

Doesnt look like you are going to get any names. Let me guess what you are hoping for, the same thing I've heard from everyone at JFK, thats its one of the TWU lackeys from AA right?

 

[AIRWOMAN]

http://www.justplanenews.com/pnews/headlines/142733371.html

 

[Jen]

When an "Interested Party" (read IAM) remains silent
It can also mean they face significant legal exposure a strategy often used when your position is not strong. a manner of speculation & rumor mongering which all of us to some extent have engaged in.That is the problem the IAM faces Not a terrific outcome.
[/quote]
If that isnt a signal to jump ship, what the he** are people waiting for?????

 

[HPMKE]

Now, just what do you think a reasonable criminal jury would do under those circumstances?


conviction




What do you think a reasonable civil jury will also do under those circumstances?
[/quote]

$$$$$$$$$$

 

[delldude]

Dude, I respectfully disagree. ....there are no "public lynchings" hapenning on this thread, IMHO. Just people saying that the law should be followed, and that is, assault is a CRIME.....GOOD DAY, PAL <_<

oops...wrong thread...thanks for pointing that out.....

pretrial lynchings in two other PHL releated threads... 😉

BTW i presented the same case/scenario on another...due process.... 🙄