UA to begin charging for "seatmates of size"

Jetsetter2Ord

Senior
Sep 1, 2005
284
3
On a Jetplane
Visit site
United gets strict on ‘seatmates of size’
Policy requires large passengers to purchase extra ticket or stay behind
Effective today, United Airlines has a new official policy that affects “seatmates of size†and those passengers seated near them.

The airline’s policy — posted on United's Web site — states that if a passenger cannot fit into a single seat, buckle their seatbelt with an additional seatbelt extension, or put the seat’s armrest down, the airline will ask that passenger to pay for an extra seat or stay behind.

Spokesperson Robin Urbanski Janikowski, meanwhile, said the airline will first attempt to take measures to avoid the extra charge. “If there is another seat on the airplane that is next to an empty seat, we will re-accommodate our guest in that seat and there is no charge,†she wrote in an e-mail message.

Until the company's posted policy reflects Urbanski Janikowski's message, passengers — large and small — should consider printing and carrying both the policy and the spokesperson's statements with them when they go to the airport.

The airline's policy applies to tickets purchased on or after March 4, 2009, for travel on or after today, April 15.

Citing “the comfort and well-being of all customers aboard United flights,†the policy states passengers meeting “one or more of these criteria†must either purchase a ticket for an additional seat or purchase an upgrade to a cabin with larger seats.

A customer who falls into any of these categories who decides not to upgrade or purchase a second seat may be denied boarding.

While Southwest and other airlines have had similar policies on their books for some time, not all airlines are as cut-and-dry about how they enforce those policies when a passenger needs some extra space.

American Airlines, for example, reserves the right to charge passengers for a second ticket, but does so only if it can find no other solution, such as re-seating the passenger next to an empty seat at no extra charge.

“If a flight is not full, our flight attendants may be able to change passenger seat assignments in order to more comfortably accommodate all passengers,†said American spokesperson Andrea Huguely.

Second seat, same fare?
According to United’s new policy, if it is determined that a passenger is required to purchase an additional seat, then “the fare for that seat will be the same as the fare paid for the original seat ... even if the additional ticket is purchased on the day of departure, when fares are normally higher.â€

However, if there are no additional seats open or if an upgraded seat is not available, then the passenger will have to wait until the next flight or until a flight with adequate seating become available. If no seats are available or if a passenger decides not to fly, then United will refund the price of the ticket without penalties.

One upside of the new policy? Those purchasing a second seat will gain that extra baggage allowance. However, because carry-on baggage policies are determined by the Transportation Security Administration, not the airline, the per-passenger carry-on restrictions remain the same no matter how many seats a single passenger ends up occupying.
 
...One upside of the new policy? Those purchasing a second seat will gain that extra baggage allowance. However, because carry-on baggage policies are determined by the Transportation Security Administration, not the airline, the per-passenger carry-on restrictions remain the same no matter how many seats a single passenger ends up occupying.

FALSE

The TSA has no control over, nor cares whatsoever for, how many carry-ons one person brings. That is an FAA and airline regulation and I'm sure the airline would be happy to allow double carry-ons for double fare.
 
There is a bill coming before Congress to make it the responsibility of TSA to limit carry ons. You don't' even take it past the checkpoint and I am all for it!
 
As Dr Phil says....HOW'S THAT WORKIN FOR YA? Well it's clear these people can't police themselves or excerpt any self control thus clogging the system and delaying departures with grandma and the kitchen sink bags. Unless you're going to re-regulate the airlines that says how many ticket agents work each gate what is your solution? The TSA is logical. You have more than 2 carry on or a huge bag? It won't make it passed the checkpoint.
 
As Dr Phil says....HOW'S THAT WORKIN FOR YA? Well it's clear these people can't police themselves or excerpt any self control thus clogging the system and delaying departures with grandma and the kitchen sink bags. Unless you're going to re-regulate the airlines that says how many ticket agents work each gate what is your solution? The TSA is logical. You have more than 2 carry on or a huge bag? It won't make it passed the checkpoint.

First of all, government always does things less efficiently than anyone else. Secondly, for example, how is the TSA supposed to enforce such a policy when I have to turn my single carry-on into three bins? One bin has my laptop and my belt, one has my Kippie bag and my shoes, and the third has what remains of my carry-on. Is the TSA really going to prevent me from combining those three bins back into one? Furthermore, how are they going to match up the carry-ons going through the X-ray with the passengers? It's like a mini-baggage claim on the other side of the metal detector.

Any problems related to enforcement of the current carry-on rule, which is not much in my observations, is solely the responsibility of the airline. Trying to pass the buck to the TSA will not solve the problem and will result in the TSA annoying everyone even more than they manage to do so already!
 
First of all, government always does things less efficiently than anyone else.
Are you saying the military can be done better with privatization? With 3% total administrative costs, is it any wonder no one wants to "privatize" medicare?

Just because Repukes are poster children for mismanagement, doesn't mean anyone else can't manage.
 
Furthermore, how are they going to match up the carry-ons going through the X-ray with the passengers? It's like a mini-baggage claim on the other side of the metal detector.

They'd be able to match up passengers with their carry-ons when they initially check your ID. At every airport I've been through, they check your ID before you even get to the tables where the bins are, and at most airports they check it again as you pass through the metal detectors.
 
This not a US Airways topic. It's not really even United (though it started out that way). Moving to Alphabet Soup.
 

Latest posts