United's Secret Deal On Planes Under Fire!

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrfish3726

Veteran
Jul 7, 2004
931
0
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi...ack=1&cset=true

I like this last statement: But Bodenstein contends that the agreement outlined by United does not guarantee someone else wouldn't pay more for the aircraft than the unnamed party the airline is working with.

I hope they are ordered to disclose :up: ! Maybe a competitor would pay more to the lease companies and banks for the planes. It would serve UniTED right if they lost the planes :blink: . They should have dealt with this issue at the very beginging. Long before they came begging the employee groups to sacrifice and take away the pensions.

AUGUST 1ST HUH, we'll see! :shock:
 
mrfish3726 said:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi...ack=1&cset=true

I like this last statement: But Bodenstein contends that the agreement outlined by United does not guarantee someone else wouldn't pay more for the aircraft than the unnamed party the airline is working with.

I hope they are ordered to disclose :up: ! Maybe a competitor would pay more to the lease companies and banks for the planes. It would serve UniTED right if they lost the planes :blink: . They should have dealt with this issue at the very beginging. Long before they came begging the employee groups to sacrifice and take away the pensions.

AUGUST 1ST HUH, we'll see! :shock:
[post="281878"][/post]​

You really need to get a life. You are another reason why I would not fly an airline with animals on it's tail. I hope the entire staff at F9 are not all like you. That would be a really scary thought.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top