What's new

Us Airways Asks Court To Outsource All

if you check they asked to do it if the contract is abrogated in 1113c....
you get wood doing this don't you?
 
DD,
Don't sweat it, they just announced they will be coming back for more from the pilots as well. So A320 was wrong and there was NOTHING to be gained by negotiating, they were going to come back for more anyway...

BOHICA
 
Dell:

Remember when the IAM said all along the "Concession Stand Is Closed"? Guess what, that still is the IAM's position and there has been little progress in negotiations.

Thus, what do you expect the company to do? If the IAM refuses to talk this gives the company tremendous leverage to outsource all heavy maintenance.

Now, what is really happening...The IAM is scared to death that AMFA will end up representing US Airways' mechanics and the IAM will not cut a deal that will eliminate jobs that could encourage the remaining mechanics to vote the IAM off of the property. Furthermore, the Company wants to eliminate all Utility and the IAM cannot agree to a deal that eliminates an entire job classification.

This would be political suicide. Thus, what is the IAM's option? To permit "imposition", with even deeper cuts than necessary, to keep the union alive at US Airways without the political fallout.

The losers? US Airways' IAM members, all of whom are great people, who will have more "pain" than was necessary if a deal had been cut earlier.

What can be done? IAM rank-and-file members can demand their union cut a deal before Judge Mitchell imposes contract terms. Remember that the court can only pick either the company's or unions last contract offer. Thus, which one do you believe will be imposed?

Finally, why do you think the IAM has not publicly commented on a strike like the CWA and AFA? In my opinion, they will be satisfied with "imposition" because it takes the IAM off of the hook at the expense of US Airways members.

Let’s hope there is a consensual agreement and the "pain" is limited as much as possible...because nobody likes what is unfolding.

Regards,

USA320Pilot
 
You could not be more far off base.

The IAM is not scared about AMFA, AMFA has all ready tried to represent US Airways mechanics and they could not muster enough A-Cards to seek an election.

And the IAM does not believe in throwing its members under the bus, unlike your union and its members.

And the IAM has stated it would strike after a contract abrogation and honor a picket line if any union strikes. Something ALPA knows nothing about, remember 92!

So keep trying.
 
hey 320 pilots, how long before management decides to outsource all the pilot jobs? You have already opened the door to a lot of it, how long before they get the rest???
 
700UW said:
You could not be more far off base.

The IAM is not scared about AMFA, AMFA has all ready tried to represent US Airways mechanics and they could not muster enough A-Cards to seek an election.

700:
It appeared that AMFA did not make it on the grounds, not due to the licensed mechanics, but the other IAM related employees. I believe the IAM licensed mechanics would prefer to be represented by their own entity. Utility and related should be represented in their own entity. Look what the AFA top of scale will be receiving if approved? More than a licensed mechanic. SAD!
 
There are only 997 utility, about 300 stock clerks, over 4,000 mechanics.
 
700UW said:
There are only 997 utility, about 300 stock clerks, over 4,000 mechanics.
[post="227735"][/post]​


These were not the numbers when the AMFA votes were counted, these are the numbers right now. There were plenty more utility and stock ckerks. Also planners and QA auditors are in the equation now.
 
The IAM is scared to death that AMFA will end up representing US Airways' mechanics and the IAM will not cut a deal that will eliminate jobs that could encourage the remaining mechanics to vote the IAM off of the property.
i didn't want to let this out but i think you're right...our chief negotiator may have had a nervous breakdown and has been hiding in a cave up in the woods in virginia. we're doing our best to get him to come out and hopefully if we get some coffee and a good meal in him he may be ready in time to save us.the IAM crisis intervention team is top notch and has assured him we won't defect to AMFA.we even have a letter from augie dellefamine promising not to have another organizing drive if he comes out of the cave.
regards,
delldude
 
700:
You can put all the numbers you want on this board ( the 141 webpage dated September 13, 2004, states different counts) but I can guarantee you that the licensed mechanics on the grounds of U, would like to be represented by their own professional union, be it AMFA or IAM. The other members can seek separate representation for their job classification.
 
planejane said:
700:
You can put all the numbers you want on this board ( the 141 webpage dated September 13, 2004, states different counts) but I can guarantee you that the licensed mechanics on the grounds of U, would like to be represented by their own professional union, be it AMFA or IAM. The other members can seek separate representation for their job classification.
[post="227744"][/post]​
like it really matters at this point in time.
maybe amfa would be just the ticket for the company now...after all they want lots of outsourcing and it seems amfa goes that way.
 
District 141 has nothing to do with the mechanic and related, that is fleet service at US.

District 142 represents the Mechanic and Related, and if the mechanics wanted AMFA they had enough #s to accomplish it.

And the NMB determines class and craft, that is why NO airline has a "mechanics" only union.
 
I did not say that the mechanics were represented by 141. I said that's where I got the info from. It's off the IAM FACT SHEET Listed.
 
PITMTC said:
These were not the numbers when the AMFA votes were counted, these are the numbers right now. There were plenty more utility and stock ckerks. Also planners and QA auditors are in the equation now.
[post="227736"][/post]​
And they were over 6,000 mechanics back then too.

Why did you omit that?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top