whlinder said:
Maybe that is why the industry is 'spinning': they are missing out on the awesome deal that they could have had.
BTW, your franchising post makes a lot of sense. 'Franchising' might just be a good term to define what is starting to happen with the industry ownership agreements.
[post="255906"][/post]
Funny you should mention franchising Airways. Check out this post from October of 2003 from TBONEJ4J.
With all respect, take your head out of the sand, and don't think US Airways is reducing ASM's.
US Airways, one of the four wholly owned subsidiaries of US Air Group may have reduced ASMs by 1.7%. Two others, ALG and PDT have reduced ASMs in the double digits.
Now take a look at the increases in ASMs for Mesa and Chautauqua, who thanks to the restructuring agreement and LOA 83 are the REAL US Airways.
Mesa's increase in ASMs since the period last year is of the order of 60%, not sure of CHQ but it should be well up there.
US Airways itself is losing ASMs, but the operation as a whole is not reducing flying, it's transferring it and growing it at Mesa and Chautauqua.
But that's what a Franchise is all about, isn't it.
Please take heads out of the sand, look around, and realise that those piddling little outsource issues, be it maintenance or flying, are the insidious disease that will end it all.
Keep it all in the Group and grow. Let it go and say Bye Bye US Airways - the Airline. Welcome US Airways the Franchise.