What's new

Worst Case

UPNAWAY

Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
685
Location
DALLAS
What drives this is not marginaly profitable or marginaly not, but could an airline recover from a UM put in a hotel due to iregualar ops ever recover if some creep abducted and kiled the um? Who would the media blame the Hotel chain or the airline? I assume the risk is far greater than the reward, it just isn't that worth it!
 
What drives this is not marginaly profitable or marginaly not, but could an airline recover from a UM put in a hotel due to iregualar ops ever recover if some creep abducted and kiled the um? Who would the media blame the Hotel chain or the airline? I assume the risk is far greater than the reward, it just isn't that worth it!

WHAT?? Please don't drive tonight... :shock:
 
are you serious????????

is this the kind of crap they talk about at the Sandcastle?
 
are you serious????????

is this the kind of crap they talk about at the Sandcastle?


OK, I did'nt proof read my post, sorry.

All I am saying if you lost a kid and the kid was abducted or abused it would be horrific!
 
OK, I did'nt proof read my post, sorry.

All I am saying if you lost a kid and the kid was abducted or abused it would be horrific!

A UM in a hotel is with a trusted employee, so the child is never entirely alone.

Feel any better now?
 
Well, to get at the underlying theme of your question, the airline is responsible for the UM. Whether the media would partially blame the hotel or not is open to conjecture, but I suspect not unless it did something completely stupid like giving a copy of the room key to some guy wearing a ski mask.

So in a worst case situation, any marginal profit we may make from carrying UM's could be more than wiped out by one unfortunate incident.

Of course, any annual profit we make could be wiped out by one unfortunate crash, so maybe we should stop flying airplanes....

Jim
 
Of course, any annual profit we make could be wiped out by one unfortunate crash, so maybe we should stop flying airplanes....

Jim

You're only mentioning that because of impending retirement. 🙂

No Jim, no US.
 
That really wasn't my intended meaning - honest. No US, no non-rev for Jim......
 
During the "great blizzard of the century", I was stuck on the tarmac in Pittsburgh for TWELVE hours in the back of an MD-80. When we were finally able to return to the terminal, there were thousands of people-wall to wall. It was impossible to get a taxi or a hotel. I saw UMs sleeping downstairs in the crew room and upstairs in the agent's break room.
 
During the "great blizzard of the century", I was stuck on the tarmac in Pittsburgh for TWELVE hours in the back of an MD-80. When we were finally able to return to the terminal, there were thousands of people-wall to wall. It was impossible to get a taxi or a hotel. I saw UMs sleeping downstairs in the crew room and upstairs in the agent's break room.



Wow!!! thousands of people in the Pittsburgh terminal? You sure are dating yourself! lol
 

Latest posts

Back
Top