Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Work on your anger issue for this year, just remember Bradford is your daddy.Res Judicata said:Happy 2014!! "The Death Year" of Scabfords pointless, yet unbelievably expensive, experiment.
USAPA = SCABS
Graceson said:Claxon, on 03 Jan 2014 - 10:06 PM, said:
Did you enjoy your retro check? Who do you thank when you cash it? (rhetorical question)
Trader replied: APA. No MOU, no retro check.
-----------------
On the subject of the MOU, retrospective pay, and a key leader arguing as advocate for lowered self-worth as a strategy, then I agree with your respect for APA with deference. --USAPA should appropriately fire this key leader... as APA prudently fired theirs.
traderjake said:
we have the MOU and the only thing you lunatics can screw up now is the seniority integration.
Cheerful as ever. Best of luck on USTUPIDS latest lawsuit du jour whereby you are once again, demanding that final and binding IS STILL NOT final and binding but yet you are OWED a monetary provision secured for you by a FORMER bargaining agent and a COMPANY THAT NO LONGER EXISTS.A320 Driver said:Cheerful as always, huh Res?
NO-NO-NO here as well...
Leverage?traderjake said:
Maybe someday you'll understand what leverage is and who had it.
Go ahead and fire Hummel, we have the MOU and the only thing you lunatics can screw up now is the seniority integration.
Graceson said:Leverage?
Begging The Question (Assuming The Answer, Tautology): debate by reasoning in a circle. The thing to be proved (lack of leverage) is used as a given.
What's absent is your deference to APA's proven strength of resolve... and then your reversal when your own argument betrays itself.
Tried it and it worked....traderjake said:Can someone post a Topic Poll with the 3 questions on the USAPA Recall Ballot?
I tried and can't get it to work.
I voted No x 3.