Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There will be 7 in service by Summer. 2 are going to be in rotation for TLV daily. Out of the other 5....
LHR
MUC
FCO
?
?
I hear they won't be putting the 332 on ATH this summer due to the deferrals which is very disappointing. Would've been nice to alleviate the weight and balance issues along with assuring greater comfort for the pax. But, I'd rather still fly it with a 76 than not fly it at all.
It's also probably a metric of how much premium revenue can be gained from a route like CLT-CDG vs. PHL-ATH. Are there more paying passengers who will buy those Envoy pods to Paris? My guess is yes.
Actually, except for June and July, the estimated Round Trip LFs are somewhat dismal.I'd think they'd want the capacity for Paris and use a 333. I was under the impression the PHL ATH market was doing very well and ran full often. Maybe not.
Actually, except for June and July, the estimated Round Trip LFs are somewhat dismal.
2008: May=56%, June=78%, July=86%, Aug=66%, Sep=66%
2007 and M/J/J 2009 were pretty much in the same ballpark.
The above does not compensate for Blocked Seats due to weight restrictions/crew rest, etc..
That said, CO's Daily EWR-ATH flights during the peak 2008 June/July months, using a larger aircraft (767-400ER), appear to have had LFs almost identical to US.
The above seems to justify, that capacity wise, the 767-200 is the right choice over the 332 for this route.
How much in landing fees, extra fuel and misconnects do we pay out?