how does the NRA.....

37412585_1763348937033804_112281496068292608_n.jpg
 
Talk about about not real bright, this is the new libtarded fresh face of the radical leftist party. I can't wait to see her in action in congress. Should be a real hoot.
 
He’s pretty much as delusional and dumb as ever

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Abraham Lincoln

clitrat and inspector 4 fall into the middle group.

Here are some examples:

The NRA is suspicous their fellow, liberal Americans but not of a chick with a heavy russian accent.

Oh! Trump MEANT to say wouldn’t, not would. It’s all good.
 
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Abraham Lincoln

clitrat and inspector 4 fall into the middle group.

Here are some examples:

The NRA is suspicous their fellow, liberal Americans but not of a chick with a heavy russian accent.

Oh! Trump MEANT to say wouldn’t, not would. It’s all good.
"Wise men speak when they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something". Plato.

Contra DumDum, the NRA is not suspicious of libtards, far from it. (it's rather odd the one-line Wonder Mutt spelling chief didn't catch your "suspicous"). We gun rights fighters know the communist liars on the Russian side are never to be trusted, just like the Demoncrat party communists. There is no suspicion, we know all too well what is happening with the radial leftists.

We just had 8 years of communist style rule from Obammy and the Hildabeast. Lest we forget, CIA John Brennan was proud of fact he is/was a member of the Communist Party. How did he get in to the CIA as the Director? Down right disgusting, but then it was the Obammy administration.

"A socialist is just a communist without a gun". James Baker
 
Last edited:
i dont take issue with the second amendment. i take issue with how foolish people interpret it.

you know, without the first four words being necessary to the security of a free STATE.

I dont read anything about personal security. the nra does.

the nra is responsible for how the amendment is interpreted. the nra has been infiltrated and funded by a foreign govt. . the nra is resposible for brainwashing people like you Hack.
Your thinking is unpatriotic. you are a cancer on American freedoms.

sorry i forgot to include you in the group of people that can be fooled all of the tiime.


it's radical, not radial.
 
Last edited:
i dont take issue with the second amendment. i take issue with how foolish people interpret it.

you know, without the first four words being necessary to the security of a free STATE.

I dont read anything about personal security. the nra does.

the nra is responsible for how the amendment is interpreted. the nra has been infiltrated and funded by a foreign govt. . the nra is resposible for brainwashing people like you Hack.
Your thinking is unpatriotic. you are a cancer on American freedoms.

sorry i forgot to include you in the group of people that can be fooled all of the tiime.


it's radical, not radial.
Contra....... You are simply falling all over your words spouting leftest dogma. The NRA does not "interpete" any part of the Second Amendment. That's the job of the supreme court. Which, by the way, has uphold the concept of "personal security". Just by claiming otherwise will not change that! Which part of "shall not be impeded" don't you understand? And what "foreign" government are you refuring to? Come on Contra, be more spacific!
 
Last edited: