Work'n short
Member
- Jan 23, 2006
- 54
- 0
Thank you Kev,Exactly. There's already 2 or 3 of the "surviving" stations that don't meet the 30 flight minimum (MSY, eg.).
It's good to see that a few people have actually read the whole 48 page document.There are many disturbing clauses in that "disposal proposal".From the scuttle I have heard around the system there are many who think that they are safe in those chosen 40.Just from where I sit,the elimination of all the cities outside the hubs presents a large number of very senior employees who will be forced to bump to maintain their retirement goal.They would be foolish to take the enhanced severance and throw away the ability to retire when alot of them are only a few years away from cashing it in.It would appear that the union did not even try and get a early retirement package for those who would readily take it.You could be sitting in one of the target stations with 20 years in and not old enough to retire and they couldnt even get you flying bennefits to entice you to leave on your own....In solidarity?...I dont think so...more like 70% against 30%.....