Negotiations........why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fast Facts about the IAMNPF, National Pension Plan
  • The IAM National Pension Fund is the 5th largest multiemployer pension fund in the United States.
  • The Fund has approximately $10.9 billion in assets.
  • The Fund has over 1,750 contributing employer locations.
  • The Fund pays pension benefits to over 90,000 retirees and beneficiaries, providing them with retirement security.
  • The Fund has over 100,000 active participants.


Fund History



Building Retirement Security for over 50 Years
In 2010, the IAM National Pension Fund celebrated its 50th year of operation. The Fund continues to grow and thrive, in spite of the fact that thousands of single-employer company pension plans across the country have been terminated or turned over to the federal government.
 
View the 50th anniversary issue of the IAMNPF magazine (PDF)
newWindow_Link.png

 
In 1960, the Fund began with one employer contributing 10 cents an hour per employee. In 2013, it has over 1,750 contributing employer locations. The current maximum contribution rate is $28.50 per hour.
 
Pension Plan benefits are paid to retired participants and their beneficiaries through employer contributions and investment earnings on the Fund's assets. Growing employer contributions and solid investment performance have increased the Fund's assets from $42,600 in 1960, to $1.08 billion in 1985, to approximately $10.7 billion as of December 31, 2013.
 
This growth has allowed the Fund to pay an increasing level of benefits to retired members: from $18,000 in 1960, to $21 million in 1978, to $170 million in 1998, to more than $500 million in 2013. The Fund has paid over $4 billion dollars in benefits to date.
 
These are measures of the Fund's growth and of its stability and security for members now and in the future.


 


Fund Investment Experience


The National Pension Plan is financed entirely by employer contributions negotiated during collective bargaining, plus investment earnings from the Fund's assets. Participants do not contribute to the plan.
 
The Fund's prudent diversification and management of assets has resulted in a strong investment track record. The Fund's Trustees adhere to a disciplined, long-term investment policy based on solid fundamentals and meticulous research and analysis. They maintain a broadly diversified portfolio and employ an active rebalancing mechanism.
 
In recent years, the plan has broadened its holdings by adding managers in a number of areas, increasing diversification. The Fund's investment program is structured to include both actively managed portfolios (where a manager decides which securities to invest in) and index funds (a pre-set basket of securities usually based on a market index such as Standard & Poor's S&P 500 Stock Index).
 
The investment committee of the Board of Trustees reviews performance and activity reports on the investment managers. In addition, the Board also regularly receives strategic input from independent consultants and academic institutions.
The Fund's long-term investment results are remarkably strong. Since 1984, the Fund's investments returned an average of 11.38% per year.
 
700UW said:
 
Fast Facts about the IAMNPF, National Pension Plan
  • The IAM National Pension Fund is the 5th largest multiemployer pension fund in the United States.
  • The Fund has approximately $10.9 billion in assets.
  • The Fund has over 1,750 contributing employer locations.
  • The Fund pays pension benefits to over 90,000 retirees and beneficiaries, providing them with retirement security.
  • The Fund has over 100,000 active participants.
Fund History
Building Retirement Security for over 50 Years
In 2010, the IAM National Pension Fund celebrated its 50th year of operation. The Fund continues to grow and thrive, in spite of the fact that thousands of single-employer company pension plans across the country have been terminated or turned over to the federal government.
 
View the 50th anniversary issue of the IAMNPF magazine (PDF)
newWindow_Link.png

 
In 1960, the Fund began with one employer contributing 10 cents an hour per employee. In 2013, it has over 1,750 contributing employer locations. The current maximum contribution rate is $28.50 per hour.
 
Pension Plan benefits are paid to retired participants and their beneficiaries through employer contributions and investment earnings on the Fund's assets. Growing employer contributions and solid investment performance have increased the Fund's assets from $42,600 in 1960, to $1.08 billion in 1985, to approximately $10.7 billion as of December 31, 2013.
 
This growth has allowed the Fund to pay an increasing level of benefits to retired members: from $18,000 in 1960, to $21 million in 1978, to $170 million in 1998, to more than $500 million in 2013. The Fund has paid over $4 billion dollars in benefits to date.
 
These are measures of the Fund's growth and of its stability and security for members now and in the future.

 
Fund Investment Experience
The National Pension Plan is financed entirely by employer contributions negotiated during collective bargaining, plus investment earnings from the Fund's assets. Participants do not contribute to the plan.
 
The Fund's prudent diversification and management of assets has resulted in a strong investment track record. The Fund's Trustees adhere to a disciplined, long-term investment policy based on solid fundamentals and meticulous research and analysis. They maintain a broadly diversified portfolio and employ an active rebalancing mechanism.
 
In recent years, the plan has broadened its holdings by adding managers in a number of areas, increasing diversification. The Fund's investment program is structured to include both actively managed portfolios (where a manager decides which securities to invest in) and index funds (a pre-set basket of securities usually based on a market index such as Standard & Poor's S&P 500 Stock Index).
 
The investment committee of the Board of Trustees reviews performance and activity reports on the investment managers. In addition, the Board also regularly receives strategic input from independent consultants and academic institutions.
The Fund's long-term investment results are remarkably strong. Since 1984, the Fund's investments returned an average of 11.38% per year.
 
Here's a list of UNION funds in trouble. 
http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/criticalstatusnotices.html
 
You asked I answered.
 
And Social Security has nothing to do with contracts and negotiations.
 
700UW said:
You asked I answered.
 
And Social Security has nothing to do with contracts and negotiations.
No kidding Sherlock.....But it is a system where people contribute and people draw on. Is that not the same as the IAMNPF? The difference being the so called $2 company contribution.
BTW, the great IAM should have negotiated $2 MORE and hour and THEN have the company kick in the 2 bucks.
 
Is the IAM or the companies taking money from the IAMNPF to fund their own operations?
 
Nope, can you say the same about the Federal Government about SS?
 
And you are all putting the cart before the horse.
 
Roadking5560 said:
Wait until the fund needs more money (more retirees) to operate or risk going into the red and they are forced to reduce the benefit level to keep solvent.  Then with the reduced benefit level some retirees need to find work to supplement their reduced income and cannot work in their area of expertise because the  IAMNPF says you can't.  Wonderful, just wonderful.
Maybe that's why it is and might stay 105% funded. Because the guys in it now can not afford to retire at 62, 65 ,68 or whenever. So the money goes in and the IAMPF makes it difficult to collect.
 
700UW said:
Is the IAM or the companies taking money from the IAMNPF to fund their own operations?
 
Nope, can you say the same about the Federal Government about SS?
 
And you are all putting the cart before the horse.
I wouldn't know that. The contributions are going to the IAMNPF. Why did the company bother terminating your pensions in the first place? Only to contribute once again? That $2 is coming out of your paychecks whether you want to believe it or not.  Like I already posted, the IAM should have negotiated $2 MORE and hour.
 
You truly dont get it.
Our pension was terminated in February of 2005, the M&R didnt get into the IAMNPF till the transition agreement in 2008.
 
The 401k match was dropped in lieu of joining into the IAMNPF, which the members voted on and approved.
 
Really need to educate yourself on what happened.
 
And your 401k match isnt coming out of your total compensation?
 
How many negotiating committees have you been part of and how many CBAs have you negotiated?
 
Why is your AA pension $2 billion underfunded and AA not putting that money in right now when AA is making billions?
 
Worry about the here and now, you dont even know what the outcome in negotiations will be in regard to the 401k and the IAMNPF, now do you?
 
Bottom line is you and your fellow Association members will vote on it.
 
Last time the association said we will vote, well we all know there was none. We believe nothing that the association says anymore. My guys on the TWU side told me personally that if the IAMPF is on the table they will reject the entire deal. It will have to forced in there by the tie breaker who is a loser IAM representative.
 
1AA said:
Last time the association said we will vote, well we all know there was none. We believe nothing that the association says anymore. My guys on the TWU side told me personally that if the IAMPF is on the table they will reject the entire deal. It will have to forced in there by the tie breaker who is a loser IAM representative.
I have new for you, there are other issues on the table that the TWU membership will vote NO on. 700 likes to say the IAM is in charge for the first two years, but needs to be reminded that the IAM is outnumbered by the TWU.
 
Rogallo said:
 
I remember the last time you said we'd vote on something.
 
Sorry, you're not credible.
I do believe the NMB made that decision on not voting and they are the government agency in charge of unions in the airlines.
 
700UW said:
I do believe the NMB made that decision on not voting and they are the government agency in charge of unions in the airlines.
 
 
Blame it on the NMB. That decision should have never made it to the NMB. The unions should have allowed their members to decide.
 
But we've beat that horse enough, haven't we!
 
According to the NMB's own handbook either the company, the TWU or the IAM could have asked for a vote and there would have had to have been one. Sounds to me like they were all working together to avoid a vote.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top