Interesting position for you to take.Mobs on the other hand are not inconvenienced by rules and think they know better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting position for you to take.Mobs on the other hand are not inconvenienced by rules and think they know better.
Well as much as you are obsessively on this board with about a 90% bitching about operations I don't want to hear any more of your whining about our company delays, mechanicals etc.. Truth is these guys signed a contract and are whining about it so like a child are acting out.
Obviously as you stated you have no technical sense of what was going on...so with that said you might want to move on to another topic.....Somehow I don't think you can
Agree 100% that being said flying these planes isn't a bad gig especially intl, trust me there are thousands of guys at commuters that would love to have the flights to Munich in a wide-body instead of flying RJ"s out of Ithica. I agree with your posts most if not all of the time, however your statement of the company negotiating with the pilots is a done deal, they signed there contract and just like a football player, baseball etc should abide by it.Brown, I hear ya! Honestly if I'm hanging out for 6, 8 10 hours for an international flight to leave, you can bet your everloving assets every person on that flight will have a full set of instructions on how to file a formal complaint with the DOT. The will have the Customer Relations Number, Dougweiser and Scooters e-mail address and any other place I can think of for them to write.
In fact I'd probably fire up my laptop and have them file the DOT complaints right then and there and show them the US website where and how to write. We don't need a Passenger Bill of Rights, we need passengers with Big Iron Balls.
Those workers are NOT to blame. The blame starts at the top and that's where the anger and stress needs to be directed towards.
The Customers and Employees keeping the heat on will either get these guys to running an airline or out the door and I have no preference as to which it is. We need to be on them like stink on manure, white on rice, etc, etc ,etc, we can't let the B*stards breathe.
The three pilots were preparing to work that flight, and those issues were discussed among themselves and the dispatcher, not the guy changing the start valve.
Why would a capt refuse an airplane for a start valve
being on placard when the engine start valves are disabled
in the air.
Isn't stink finger 3rd base??Barry,
What planet are you on?
What is employee stink finger?
Citing distance, you apparently have ruled out employer stink finger?
When one is given a hammer by management, then asked to screw something together, it does get rather messy.
The dispatcher accepted the MEL but the captain didn't.
Apparantly your statement on the 3 pilots discussing this with dispatch is not all that accurate.
Now...back to your desk job!
This is a typical post from someone who thinks they know it all.This is typical of posters who know nothing of the process.
The aircraft had an MEL. The Captain would have discussed this with the pilots during their extensive pre-flight planning. Additionally, the Captain would have discussed with dispatch any MELs in additon to a number of other issues such as weather, ride reports, fuel planning, alternates, etc.
We have no way of knowing if the dispatcher agreed, but the Captain's decision would have been final. In my experience, most often the dispatchers are on the same wave length as the pilots. The decision would have been made in that way, pilots and dispatcher, not pilots and maintenance.
Most of the posters such as yourself have such a poor understanding of the engine start system that you could not possibly understand why the Captain made a very rational decision. :down:
Desk job? Hah!
Why would a capt refuse an airplane for a start valve
being on placard when the engine start valves are disabled
in the air.
The dispatcher accepted the MEL but the captain didn't.
Apparantly your statement on the 3 pilots discussing this with dispatch is not all that accurate.
Now...back to your desk job!
The mechanic says the MEL was applied....which means the mechanic called MOC, MOC discussed with dispatch and then dispatch applied it. ........You do understand that maintenance puts the MEL on right?
Isn't stink finger 3rd base??
Oh, my dear. This is happening almost on a daily basis. We have MTC isssues with the A330 every day. They need to be pulled off the line and and get the white glove treatment.
NiceThis is a typical post from someone who thinks they know it all.
I understand the engine start system...having gone to Boeing factory school in Seattle and GE school in Ohio...of course you being the expert will dispute this claim , but frankly your opinions don't mean anything.
Did you read the posts carefully? The mechanic says the MEL was applied....which means the mechanic called MOC, MOC discussed with dispatch and then dispatch applied it. The Captain then refused it and the MEL was cleared....hope you don't read your checklists as poorly as you did the posts in this topic.
You do understand that maintenance puts the MEL on right?
Typical know it all. I will not waste time responding to your posts...have at it if you want the last word. Good bye.