I believe the unions place too much faith in 'bargaining in good faith'.
It is patently clear the company has not done so - that is a reality.
It is also clear the till is approaching empty - that is also reality. I have no doubt that the company, with deliberate malice and aforethought, brought that about.
Be that as it may, that last reality puts not only the unions, but the judge, between a rock and a hard place. Force the company towards good faith, and I believe they'd just as soon liquidate - "we will cut costs, WITH OR WITHOUT labor agreements." That, my friends, is the strategy in a nutshell. And I believe the judge will grant concessions, temporary and permanent, rather than have 'liquidation' on his resume (although if the Hoover wing of the Republican party continues to prevail, that make likely be a badge of honor <_< ).
Do you really think the company will back down?
On the other hand, the unions have not done such a keen job building inter- or intra-member solidarity. I don't think they have the membership support (and oh, how I wish they did!) OR the stones to play hardball, like the company is doing. The recent self-immolation at ALPA would be case 1 in point.
I am not saying, give the company whatever it wants. I am saying they are going to take it, one way or the other, and all of the consentual agreements and 1113 letters would not have changed that.
I sincerely hope I am wrong.
One last thing. For those who don't think politics matter, Gore would NOT have used the ATSB as a straw horse against labor, and management would NOT have had the free hand to do any damthing they please.
Election Day is right around the corner - who wants a second serving of the past 4 years?
It is patently clear the company has not done so - that is a reality.
It is also clear the till is approaching empty - that is also reality. I have no doubt that the company, with deliberate malice and aforethought, brought that about.
Be that as it may, that last reality puts not only the unions, but the judge, between a rock and a hard place. Force the company towards good faith, and I believe they'd just as soon liquidate - "we will cut costs, WITH OR WITHOUT labor agreements." That, my friends, is the strategy in a nutshell. And I believe the judge will grant concessions, temporary and permanent, rather than have 'liquidation' on his resume (although if the Hoover wing of the Republican party continues to prevail, that make likely be a badge of honor <_< ).
Do you really think the company will back down?
On the other hand, the unions have not done such a keen job building inter- or intra-member solidarity. I don't think they have the membership support (and oh, how I wish they did!) OR the stones to play hardball, like the company is doing. The recent self-immolation at ALPA would be case 1 in point.
I am not saying, give the company whatever it wants. I am saying they are going to take it, one way or the other, and all of the consentual agreements and 1113 letters would not have changed that.
I sincerely hope I am wrong.
One last thing. For those who don't think politics matter, Gore would NOT have used the ATSB as a straw horse against labor, and management would NOT have had the free hand to do any damthing they please.
Election Day is right around the corner - who wants a second serving of the past 4 years?