Truth Hurt?

[southwind]

Wait 'til Nobama raises taxes on people making over $250,000 a year. You know, the majority of people who run small busineses...........and hire 7 out of every 10 people.

Guess were these small business owners will look for cuts because of higher taxes ?
Thats right ........the very people that work for them and that more than likely voted for Nobama, will lose their jobs !

How's that for irony?

 

[KCFlyer]

Wait 'til Nobama raises taxes on people making over $250,000 a year. You know, the majority of people who run small busineses...........and hire 7 out of every 10 people.

Guess were these small business owners will look for cuts because of higher taxes ?
Thats right ........the very people that work for them and that more than likely voted for Nobama, will lose their jobs !

How's that for irony?

Look how many "red states" have seen factories close and jobs shipped offshore after those people voted for Bush. Why is Ohio considered a key state for the GOP this year? Because it was close last time, but they went for Bush...the GOP knows that a lot of them no longer have the jobs or income that they had, and are looking for some way to blame democrats for it. Sorry, but to somebody who wasn't making close to $250,000 a year (and was working for someone who most likely was being paid millions per year), increasing the taxes of someone making $250 k or more isn't going to be a show stopper

 

[delldude]

Factory closings....look up NAFTA.

Auto plants= gas prices...oh ,I forgot...its a Bush thing.

THEY TALKED A LOT OF CRAP DURING THE ELECTION......"AND IT HAS NOT PAID OFF".................................................................
...

JESUS/MARY and JOSEPH............DELL,..................IT has NOT PAID off because they don't have a VETO PROOF MAJORITY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So who says what they want is right anyhow......thats why no veto proof majority Dude.

 

[Tug McGroin]

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Quote;

THEY TALKED A LOT OF CRAP DURING THE ELECTION......"AND IT HAS NOT PAID OFF".................................................................
...

JESUS/MARY and JOSEPH............DELL,..................IT has NOT PAID off because they don't have a VETO PROOF MAJORITY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CHRIST,................IF I didn't know any better..(DELL),......I'd be thinking that I was TALKING/(posting) to..Tug McGroin... :blink:

In 2006, the will of the voters was clear, they wanted change; not just any change, but an end to the Iraq War and accountability for President Bush and his cronies.

So Black Bears, did the majority Democrats in Congress vote to fund the Iraq War through the remainder of Bush’s term?

Do the majority Democrats in Congress convene congressional hearing to pursue impeachment of President Bush?

Did the majority Democrats in Congress vote to give immunity to telecom companies in the new Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?

Please explain.

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

In 2006, the will of the voters was clear, they wanted change; not just any change, but an end to the Iraq War and accountability for President Bush and his cronies.

So Black Bears, did the majority Democrats in Congress vote to fund the Iraq War through the remainder of Bush’s term?

Do the majority Democrats in Congress convene congressional hearing to pursue impeachment of President Bush?

Did the majority Democrats in Congress vote to give immunity to telecom companies in the new Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?

Please explain.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Funny you mention Impeaching EL-CHIMPO.

Heard yesterday, that the Motion from D/OH Dennis Kusinich was going to move to the "next step" in the HOUSE !

 

[Tug McGroin]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Funny you mention Impeaching EL-CHIMPO.

Heard yesterday, that the Motion from D/OH Dennis Kusinich was going to move to the "next step" in the HOUSE !

"An attempt by Rep. Dennis Kucinich to impeach President Bush was kicked into legislative no-man's land by members of his own party Wednesday.

The House voted 251-166 to send the Ohio Democrat's impeachment resolution to committee, a maneuver that allows the Democratic leadership to freeze the measure indefinitely.

The vote largely followed partisan lines, with 225 Democrats voting on Kucinich's request to send the measure to committee for consideration.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has repeatedly said she would not support a resolution calling for Bush's impeachment, saying such a move was unlikely to succeed and would be divisive.

Is this the "next step" you're talking about?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/11/kuc...h.impeach.vote/

No comment on the war funding?

No comment on FISA?

 

[cltrat]

you would think with a 140 a barrel oil the morons would have more to worry about

 

[KCFlyer]

In 2006, the will of the voters was clear, they wanted change; not just any change, but an end to the Iraq War and accountability for President Bush and his cronies.

So Black Bears, did the majority Democrats in Congress vote to fund the Iraq War through the remainder of Bush’s term?

Tug...they did indeed. After several vetos where they wanted to see a little proof that cowboy George had an actual PLAN for this war. The alternative was being painted as "unpatriotic" and "not supporting the troops" from a still strong GOP propaganda machine. I dunno...if it would have been a democrat president and a republican congress with a war going on, would the republicans have been lauded for delaying a troop funding bill because the democratic president kept vetoing any bill that included withdrawal plans?

Do the majority Democrats in Congress convene congressional hearing to pursue impeachment of President Bush?

No. I call that being good stewards of the publics money. You do know that an impeachment (as well as a veto override) requires a two thirds majority vote, don't you? They couldn't override a Bush veto because they didn't hold a two thirds majority, so why waste tax money on an impeachment process you can't win - even though the old Busher was more worthy of impeachment proceedings than Clinton ever was. All Clinton ever got was a blowjob. All Bush ever did was URGE THE ENEMY TO ATTACK OUR TROOPS...do you not remember 'bring 'em on' uttered by Sheriff W?

Did the majority Democrats in Congress vote to give immunity to telecom companies in the new Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?

That's a damn shame right there. Of course, had they not, the GOP would be playing up the "emboldening the terrorists" line.

 

[delldude]

I think you guys and some in the left stretch the definitions on impeachable offenses.
Seems if some disagree with Presidential decisions,its an impeachable offense.Ask NHBB

As Tug indicates...the paper tiger Dems have caved on the Iraq issue.George Soros tried to run this congress and he didn't succeed.Yet.Obama may be coming.

As for withdrawal......how can one pre plan in an uncertainty?

 

[Tug McGroin]

I think you guys and some in the left stretch the definitions on impeachable offenses.
Seems if some disagree with Presidential decisions,its an impeachable offense.Ask NHBB

As Tug indicates...the paper tiger Dems have caved on the Iraq issue.George Soros tried to run this congress and he didn't succeed.Yet.Obama may be coming.

As for withdrawal......how can one pre plan in an uncertainty?

DellDude,

Seems odd to me that every time I engage Black Bears in a discussion, he logs off and KCFlyer is there to answer the questions.

Also seems odd that they both joined US Aviation on the exact same day.

Could it be . . . .?

 

[KCFlyer]

I think you guys and some in the left stretch the definitions on impeachable offenses.
Seems if some disagree with Presidential decisions,its an impeachable offense.Ask NHBB

As Tug indicates...the paper tiger Dems have caved on the Iraq issue.George Soros tried to run this congress and he didn't succeed.Yet.Obama may be coming.

As for withdrawal......how can one pre plan in an uncertainty?

When the commander in chief of the armed forces urges the enemy to attack our country...and how did YOU interpret "bring 'em on"...then that is an act of treason and Bush should have been impeached on the spot.

Bedsides, we all know that blowjobs are the real grounds for impeachment.

 

[southwind]

When the commander in chief of the armed forces urges the enemy to attack our country...and how did YOU interpret "bring 'em on"...then that is an act of treason and Bush should have been impeached on the spot.

Bedsides, we all know that blowjobs are the real grounds for impeachment.

Blow jobs are not an impeachable act !

"LYING" to congress about recieving said blow job "IS" an impeacable act !

 

[KCFlyer]

Blow jobs are not an impeachable act !

"LYING" to congress about recieving said blow job "IS" an impeacable act !

Which brings up the question...what was Congress asking the president about blowjobs for in the first place? Were there not more pressing matters facing this country at the time?

 

[Veritas]

Also seems odd that they both joined US Aviation on the exact same day.

That is because USAviation migrated to new software late at night on August, 19 2002, and all members had to re-register.

 

[KCFlyer]

That is because USAviation migrated to new software late at night on August, 19 2002, and all members had to re-register.

Either that, or I'm YOU too.