NewHampshire Black Bears
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 10,154
- 681
Big news to be sure, but as I originally posted at the beginning of this thread, certainly not unexpected. While I thought this would've come another month or so later, if you're going to go forward with it, then this shows that they're at least making the decisions necessary that are needed to survive and compete.
What this also will signal, I believe, is that the other legacy's will soon be announcing somewhat similar decisions as well. Remember, the price of oil doesn't care what the name is on the side of the aircraft, it affects everyone. I'd mentioned something earlier on another post about "rationalizing the narrow-body fleet" and that this could've been one outcome of an earlier proposed UAL/LCC merger. Now that that's not going to happen I believe we're seeing what UAL has been espousing for years....a single narrow-body fleet structure. Years ago the planners saw this as a 5-10 process but one that would be made and would reap benefits (efficiency/scheduling/crew training/etc.)
Okay, so now it's upon us today or soon for sure. Take the hit early, be ahead of the rest of the industry in this and recover. Makes sense. Gonna hurt in the short term though. Just for something to ponder......as per the most recent manpower report the current 737 operation utilizes
477 CAPs/492 F/Os. Ouch!!!
Cheers,
Z B)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
" Z ",
Sorry to see it "go down" this hard,...BUT..(you know it, and I know it),..That sometimes it's necessary to have to take a dose of NASTY medicine, for the...(better) Long run !
And as someone just recently said, ....."OK it's our(UA's) turn "in the barrel",......but as we climb out,............WHO's "NEXT"