Why is that? Is it from past experiences or that you have heard it so many times before and now you think of it as fact? Yes in the past American manufacturers came out with garbage. When I was growing up my parents had a Dodge. That thing was the biggest POS on four wheels. However if you look at the reliability of some of the latest models coming out of Detroit they are competitive with Japanese cars in the same class.
If you had a choice of say buying a VW or let’s say a Saturn which one would you buy? If your choice is a VW all I can say is I hope you enjoy spending time in your local VW dealerships customer lounge. Given the fact that VW consistently have some of the lowest reliability ratings that’s where you’re going to be spending a lot of your time. Speaking of Saturn’s I have one that has over 100000 miles on it. I have yet to have an unscheduled maintenance item come up.
How many people here in the states can afford a BMW, Mercedes or an Audi for that matter. As far as VW are concerned you would have to pay me to drive one. While diesels are more efficient than gasoline engines they also put out more particulate matter along with more NOx. The engines themselves are more expensive as well.
One of the problems Detroit has had over the years is that some people still think they build junk because that’s what they were basically making in seventies and eighties. Another problem is PR. You have to admit the Japanese manufacturers are better at it than Detroit. Toyota refers to recalls as “service campaignsâ€. When people hear “recall†they have images cars blowing up or steering going out in rush hour traffic. Service campaign has a better ring to it.
Lets not forget that Japanese cars get recalled all the time like US built cars do. In fact last year in Japan Toyota was under investigation for criminal negligence in regards to recalls. The people at the center of the investigation were in charge of quality control. Can you imagine if the people in charge of quality control at GM were under investigation here in the states? It would be the led story on the nightly news.
Finally part of the problem Detroit brought upon them selves. In the 90’s as we all know gas was cheap and people wanted big trucks and SUV’s. Detroit responded by spending most of their money satisfying that demand. Which meant they were not putting that much effort into smaller vehicles. Japanese manufacturers came out with their own line up of SUV’s and trucks. However they did not have the wide array that US companies had. They also were updating their smaller cars more often than Detroit was.
I guess I used a poor choice of words. I have not found a US manufactured car that meets my requirements. There are several US cars that I like such as a Corvete, Viper, 300 series, Sky/Solarius (I may have that last name wrong) but they do not meet all my needs. I want a rear wheel drive car, nicely equipped, limited electronics, fuel efficient, safe, more than likely used, decent resale value. My wife just bought a E300 Diesel. It had 61k on the ODO. Bought it for $12k from a dealer. Care is clean as a whistle and makes well over 30mpg on day to day driving. From what I saw, there was nothing on the market that could come to it. Most people do not take care of cars in general. MB/BWM/Audi … tend to be better taken care of do to their cost. Since her car is 12 years old, the only electronics on it are ABS brakes. The AC is push button instead of the older dials but I guess it's the cost of progress. It’s a full size sedan that will hold 5 people. It is pretty easy to do most maintenance on it my self, no need to worry about tunes ups, the engine should last 300k or more. Yes maintenance is a bit more costly but it is a car we will be able to keep for another 10, 15 or more years. My MB is 20 years old and still going strong.
I simply do not see that kind of longevity in US cars, at least not yet.
You drew the comparison between a Saturn and VW. I am a car lover. My car is an extension of who I am to a degree. It is not merely transportation from A to B. I would chose the VW over the Saturn in a heart beat due to the fact that the VW will out perform the Saturn and the VW just looks and feels better IMO. If I was looking for basic transportation from A to B, and was looking for a throw away car after a few years, I'd go with the Saturn. It's going to have lower resale, and while it may cost more to maintain the VW, my hunch is the Saturn will not be worth fixing due to depreciation.
My dad had a 1989 BMW 750IL. The car was a beast. We bought it at an auction. 12 cylinders of raw power. Kept it for 10 years with out any problems. Great mileage on the hwy to, about 23 or 24 at cruising speed. There was not a US car made that could touch it in terms of fit/finish or capability. Cadillac and Lincoln are the only luxury US manufactures and they did not have sh1t in 89 that could even come close.
I am partial to German cars. They have been building cars that are meant to be driven for decades and they are very very good at it. That's why they are the bench mark that everyone else strives for. My wifes 300 will do 120 130 all day long if asked to and it won't over heat, won't float all over the road at speed. It will do what it is designed to do. The US is starting to design cars to be driven. Corvett can finally be in the same sentence as a Porch 911 with people laughing.
The bottom line seems to be that while US cars are getting better, they have a way to go to break away from their history. They still don’t make cars that compete on the styling and mileage level of Japan and Europe. It's like we are a step behind and a dollar short. The big 3 are still hanging their fortunes on trucks and SUV's while everyone else see the writing on the wall about fuel prices. Does any US manufacture even have a clean diesel on the block for 2008? MB and VW do. I thought I heard the Honda will as well. Chrysler has a diesel 300 in Europe? Why not here. The engine is MB engine which is being sold here in the US in MB's, why not the 300?