topDawg
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 2,957
- Reaction score
- 2,298
I assume you mean T2 not T1.....but yes. I fail to see your point here.LDVAviation said:If Delta bussed passengers to T1, Delta would have to pay for the bus service itself. All for one gate? (AA's bus service is partially subsided by LAWA because AA moved the Eagle ops to accommodate LAWA's capital plans.)
You have no idea if they would or wouldn't be able to get priority space or not. I know in your dream world LAWA is going to tell Delta to piss off, but if Delta were to pony up they would have the ability to get rights to TBIT gates just as carriers moving over from T2 (for example) have been. Generally they would not get rights for domestic gating at TBIT but Delta has enough flying to Mexico and SYD/HND/NRT that it would free up a little bit of space.LDVAviation said:If Delta started using gates at TBIT, it would have no gating priority. Even for AA, the connector is convenient only because AA is getting gating priority, with almost all of its flight boarding at gates at or near the core.
And its a long walk from TBIT to T6. That is LAX now.LDVAviation said:Delta would not get similar treatment. It is a long walk to either end of TBIT West, especially if you are starting out in T5.
If it would be it wouldn't be by much.LDVAviation said:LAWA calculated the distance of the various bus routes. Yes, the T4 to Eagle route was the longest. But the T5 to T2 route would be longer.
nothing is ever final. If AA wants to pay and can find a place to put AS for example they will move. Hell AA could get control of T5 if they wanted........LDVAviation said:AS has a lease on T6 until 2022. It isn't going anywhere.
The price to pay wouldn't be reasonable but everything is for sale.
because they have to? They don't have a lease with LAWA for those gates. They become open gates once united lease ends on T6.LDVAviation said:Why do you think AA will give up control of the four gates at T6?
United has the right right to renew. It also has provisions in its new lease with LAWA that would extend its leases on T6.LDVAviation said:This was not subject to renegotiation with United as you indicated. At which point, one of the options was to retire the gates because LAWA needed the gate numbers elsewhere, e.g., MSC. Putting AA there for the next couple of years is consistent with what LAWA eventually wants to do with the gates and AA's own growth plans.)
I have the plans on my computer. They might be old but there was at one time plans for such.LDVAviation said:There are NO plans for Terminal 9. (Those were the plans of a previous regime.) There are plans for a Terminal 0, next to Terminal 1. The most likely beneficiary of that terminal is Southwest, not Delta.
Delta renegotiated its lease for the GSE shop. They also agreed to lease the Western widebody hangar on a per use bases.LDVAviation said:(By the way, in bankruptcy, Delta ceded the master leases to its hangars/toolshops to LAWA. As a result, Delta does not have any leverage with respect to what happens on land occupied by its hangar complex.)
since then Delta/LAWA have reworked the lease giving Delta a little bit more control over the widebody hangar.
The lowbay hangar lease I believe is with United now.
Delta also leases the little tower over by the tent hangars.
Of course it sounds like all of this is about to make a some what big change once United moves over to the CO hangars. (and more importantly Delta runs out of room to park 330s/777s inside the TWA hangar.)
LAWA has given it to them twice. You might be right, but again. You don't know this. Want it? sure Know it? nah.LDVAviation said:In the short term, Delta cannot go back to parking at its hangar. That was only a temporary exemption. With the NIMBY's snooping around as a result of the Ontario lawsuit, LAWA is likely to play things very close to the vest for a while.