AA and Restraint of Trade to Employee Family

WingNaPrayer

Veteran
Aug 20, 2002
1,742
0
EYW
Visit site
Found this on one of the Union sites today, and I find it both interesting, and impossible to enforce:
____________________________________________

AA Reaches Into MIA Agents Families – Restraint of Trade

June 20, 2007 – (MIA) Agents arrived to work today to find a brand new item dropped into their training lessons, complete with mandatory compliance by July 31, 2007 regarding what the company calls “Conflict of Interest.†Here is the text of the lesson as stated, and we will discuss the ramifications of this lesson at the end:

Miami Passenger Services Conflict of Interest/Employee Solicitation:

It has been recently brought to management’s attention that employees are soliciting co-workers and family members to get involved with a website named “Your Travel Biz†(YTB). After joining the YTB group, enrollees are provided with business cards, ID cards, and a website specific to the member. Members then function as a cyber-travel agent, and receive compensation when customers purchase airline tickets, car rentals, cruises, hotels, etc., via the website.

After a review by our corporate policy and legal departments it has been determined that this activity results in a “conflict of interest†for American Airlines’ employees. Please visit our Jetnet.AA.Com employee policy guide, “joining the company introduction to American Airlines, working for another company†which states in part:

Ownership of, or an interest in, a travel agency by any AA employee or family member is never permitted. In addition, please refer to AA’s standards of business conduct. You must inform your immediate supervisor in writing if you have a spouse, domestic partner or family immediate member who is working for a travel agency or in a management/specialist or officer/director capacity for a competitor. A copy of this letter must be placed in your personnel file.

This advisory serves as official notification that your involvement in activity that is considered a conflict of interest may result in corrective action up to and including dismissal from the company.

In addition this is a reminder that if you work for or decide to work for another company, or are self-employed while at AA, you must notify your manager in writing. A copy of this letter will be placed in your personnel file.

Furthermore, using company resources to promote a personal business of any kind is prohibited, and employees must refrain from using lists, or email addresses of other employees in order to solicit potential customers for their own personal business.

Feel free to contact your customer service manager or shift manager if you have any questions. In order to get credit for this lesson, you MUST type “I will complyâ€.



********** ********** ********** **********

First off, this doesn’t read as a lesson. How many lessons have you taken that start out with: It has been recently brought to management’s attention Poor grammar and syntax aside, this isn’t a lesson – it’s a set-up!

American Airlines portends to have the right to reach into your family tree, and dictate what your immediate family members may or may not do for a living. This in itself is unconscionable! For the record, American describes immediate family members as: Spouse, parents, step-parents, grand parents, step-grand parents, brothers, step-brothers, sisters, step-sisters, in-laws (spouse, domestic partner or registered companion’s: parents, step-parents, grand parents, step-grand parents, brothers, step-brothers, sisters, and step-sisters), (as listed for travel authorization – the lesson does not specify “family immediate member†[sic]) Like anything else, the list could go deeper at American’s discretion). All of this Orwellian control over your family members, in exchange for the wage concessions and slashed benefits they provide to you, is it really worth it? With “family immediate member†included along with the employee, this could potentially mean more than a half-million people restricted from YTB under threat of termination of the employee (who has no control over what their family members do anyway), but dismissal from the company because you may have a family member with a website that is a YTB affiliate? Does that include any family member who may use a YTB affiliated friend to make travel arrangements? Somebody please, draw the line! This is clearly an attempt by American to reach into the employee’s family home, family tree, and attempt to control what employee’s family members do. Just when did AA write their own intra-company version of the Patriot Act?

Look at it this way, is the up to 20 bucks an hour or less American compensates a single Agent, enough to give them the right to dictate the lives of potentially dozens of people that an Agent may be related to? You’ll each need to decide on that one.

Once the lesson has been taken, you must sign it with I WILL COMPLY. One has to wonder just when did the Borg assimilated AA management as that is clearly a Borg reply. The only thing missing is the lock-step and nihilist salute!

It is not normal for a lesson to give a response of a personal nature from the MIA Passenger Service Seven upon completion, but this one does, as you’ll see after you have “complied†with the lesson. (Ok, lets cut to the chase, this isn’t really a lesson, it is a statement of life control which you must “comply†with or face the consequences).

Agents, be on the alert. You know better than anyone else that you have no control whatsoever over what your family does for a living, just like family members can’t control you working for AA. However, the way this “I Will Comply†nonsense is set up, a family member could take a job tomorrow that will result in your being terminated. A Family member could affiliate with any travel service on the internet, and it will result in your being terminated. In this instance, YTB has been specifically named. This is clearly restraint of trade!

Enough is enough! Contact your HDQ HR department regarding this issue immediately and voice your concern.


Contact:

Jeffrey J. Brundage – SVP
Human Resources, American Airlines
4333 Amon Carter Boulevard
Fort Worth, TX 76155
1-817-967-3462

To those of you agents who have already “complied†you should quickly have a look at your immediate family employment situations, for your own protection, so in the very least you are prepared for what could come. A6001/CWA has thus far been silent on the relatively new issue. The Miami Group however, has not (since it appears this is only being directed at MIA Passenger Service employees so far) and it is recommended that Agents not rush into this lesson too quickly. The “Mandatory Compliance†does not expire until July 31, 2007, and after that date although your lesson points system may drop, it is not a terminable offense as of yet. However, the MIA Passenger Service Seven may make it so when it is learned that not all agents are willing to surrender the rights and freedoms of their family members to American Airlines.

Good Luck!
 
I get the intent of the policy, but you're right that it's next to impossible to enforce.

Ownership of an agency by an airline employee is a conflict of interest, but mainly because airline access to Sabre provides a lot of insider information that would be of huge benefit to a travel agency, i.e. how many seats in V inventory are really left for sale in a given market, or which flights are overbooked yet available for sale, thus increasing the ability of someone being able to get DBC vouchers with no intention of actually flying (this happened quite a bit out of MIA and JFK years back).

It's also a conflict of interest for Sabre in this mess: travel agencies pay for their access to Sabre in a lot of cases (some don't because of rebates due to volume). If you do the bare minimum of hits to create a record in the agency partition, and then sign in thru airline Sabre to do things like prereserve seats, add remarks, etc., AA winds up paying for all those hits to Sabre, and not the agency. Likewise, if the PNR is created by the agency, but segments are booked by the airline, Sabre loses out on the booking fees charged to the airline.

At one point, there were hundreds of agents and FSC's at JFK who were working for AA and Jetblue simultaneously. If that's not a conflict of interest, nothing is. And AA didn't do squat about it, and the GM of JFK even acknowleged it was taking place and didn't want to disrupt things.
 
I can see restricting the employee from conflict of interest second jobs, but to reach into the family like this and to threaten the employee with termination is really insane.

How many employees can control what their relatives do for a living? I'm betting the majority of them would tell the AA employee to quit or go to hell if they said anything.

Website affiliation is big money for corporate America, especially in the travel industry. But, to tell employees that if any of their relatives have anything to do with a specific company, in this case, YTB, they are subject to retribution by AA all the way up to termination is just plain crazy.

This one is going to bite someone in the butt!
 
I can see restricting the employee from conflict of interest second jobs, but to reach into the family like this and to threaten the employee with termination is really insane.

How many employees can control what their relatives do for a living? I'm betting the majority of them would tell the AA employee to quit or go to hell if they said anything.

Website affiliation is big money for corporate America, especially in the travel industry. But, to tell employees that if any of their relatives have anything to do with a specific company, in this case, YTB, they are subject to retribution by AA all the way up to termination is just plain crazy.

This one is going to bite someone in the butt!

Good time for some union protection. AA has lots of lawyers. Few agents have a lawyer on retainer.
 
Right. As if union representation has done so much for the other employee workgroups lately...
 
Right. As if union representation has done so much for the other employee workgroups lately...

Now, now......... Don't go all negative here. I can think of a number of people who have been helped by their union. Even in a very similar situation here a while back.

Sometimes, even a poor union is better than no union. Particularly at the local level, where there are some really good people.
 
Sometimes, even a poor union is better than no union. Particularly at the local level, where there are some really good people.

...and Miami has some very good people. They're just mired down in all the muck!

The mass exodus from MIA to DFW continues. Miami is so short handed now they are actually hiring agents off the streets, no experience required!

How long will it be before corporate wakes their bonus absconding asses up and realizes there is a very serious problem with how MIA is being run?

Listening to Hazy explain why things are wrong is like listening to Ronnie Reagan testifying at the Iran contra hearings. (Are "I wasn't aware of that" and "I don't recall" close to being the same thing?)

MIA is AA's bread and butter, and their micro-managers are about to flush it all down the crapper! I've been on too many AA planes not to wonder how long it will be before passsengers are offered discounts off of the price of their tickets if they bring their own duct tape? :unsure:
 
Nothing's going to change in MIA until Peter Dolara finally retires or dies.

Every VP that's been assigned to MIA since it was hubbed (O'Hare, Torno, Lebright, Hazy) were all hand picked by Peter as being loyal subjects. The hub VP and managers may have a dotted line back to HDQ, but Dolara is still calling all the shots.

Because of that patronage system, few smart people from outside of MCLA consider transferring into MIA, even for a promotion. So you keep getting managers and CSM's who have all been promoted from within, instead of perhaps getting some fairly decent people from other hubs or large stations who would be willing to try something different for a change.

The other side of that is that few managers survive outside of MIA when they do transfer. Cleaver didn't last a year outside of MIA before he went running back to the islands. Marilyn D is perhaps the exception there, and that's because she spent most of her career in NYC and didn't drink all the koolaid when she did her stint in MIA.

If anyone at HDQ had the balls to hold MIA to the same standards as ORD, JFK, DFW, LGA, etc., perhaps it wouldn't be such a mess.
 
Nothing's going to change in MIA until Peter Dolara finally retires or dies.

Every VP that's been assigned to MIA since it was hubbed (O'Hare, Torno, Lebright, Hazy) were all hand picked by Peter as being loyal subjects. The hub VP and managers may have a dotted line back to HDQ, but Dolara is still calling all the shots.

Because of that patronage system, few smart people from outside of MCLA consider transferring into MIA, even for a promotion. So you keep getting managers and CSM's who have all been promoted from within, instead of perhaps getting some fairly decent people from other hubs or large stations who would be willing to try something different for a change.

The other side of that is that few managers survive outside of MIA when they do transfer. Cleaver didn't last a year outside of MIA before he went running back to the islands. Marilyn D is perhaps the exception there, and that's because she spent most of her career in NYC and didn't drink all the koolaid when she did her stint in MIA.

If anyone at HDQ had the balls to hold MIA to the same standards as ORD, JFK, DFW, LGA, etc., perhaps it wouldn't be such a mess.


//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////"

"WHOA....Way to go Eric,..........Get all that ANGER out that you've been surpressing, since you reluctantly left AA"

I'm being VERY SERIOUS HERE, I'm genuinly APPLAUDING you !!!!!

It sounds like MIA is to Hubs....like BOS has been, and still is, to non Hubs !!!!!!!!!!!!

NH/BB's
 
Bears, it's hardly anger. I'm disappointed that AMR really f***ed up the one shot they had to turn things around with regard to management/labor negotiations, but what's been going on in MIA has been that way since the earliest days of the hub.

My leaving was hardly what I'd call reluctant. When the new company made their salary offer, I felt like those AMT's who just won the lotto.
 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////"

"WHOA....Way to go Eric,..........Get all that ANGER out that you've been surpressing, since you reluctantly left AA"

I'm being VERY SERIOUS HERE, I'm genuinly APPLAUDING you !!!!!

It sounds like MIA is to Hubs....like BOS has been, and still is, to non Hubs !!!!!!!!!!!!

NH/BB's

NH/BB --

You are SOOOO right about BOS! It has (or had) so much POTENTIAL that AA has totally squandered over the years. Really, AA should be totally dominating BOS but it has lagged for years with inadequate staffing. I remember looking at the stats for agent injuries...BOS had the constant highest number of agent injuries (due to things like severe paper cuts from boarding pass printers and so forth). It was clear that the agents were expected to work too hard!
 
NH/BB --

You are SOOOO right about BOS! It has (or had) so much POTENTIAL that AA has totally squandered over the years. Really, AA should be totally dominating BOS but it has lagged for years with inadequate staffing. I remember looking at the stats for agent injuries...BOS had the constant highest number of agent injuries (due to things like severe paper cuts from boarding pass printers and so forth). It was clear that the agents were expected to work too hard!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


formeraa,

I hear what your saying, however, I was "alluding" to the fact that with the FULL knowlege of MANY past/present Management teams, that BOS...FAR and away..."consumed" more STOLEN AA property(liquid form "xxx"), WHILE on the clock, than ANY, and I mean ANY other mainline station, in the country !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What a GREAT "*ucking" distinction.

NH/BB's
 
Just out of curiousity, what did the union do? Stand by and condone illegal activity by their members?

Don't bother answering, because we already know the answer:

"They can do that, brother!"
 

Latest posts