“Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politiciansâ€￾

[local 12 proud]

Judicial Watch

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

Judicial Watch

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Judicial watch......A Gov. watchdog group, became KNOWN for it's first "client" Bill Clinton !


🙄 🙄 🙄 "Nice try"........."12". Check out the Rutherford group, and the Heritage foundation.

All "cornerstones" of the vast Right Wing Conspiricy ! :down: :down: :down:


Jesus, I wonder why TOM "DEE-LAY" never made it into the top 10 ??

 

[local 12 proud]

Hey Bears dont hate the messenger, the Truth bites sometimes! 😛

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

Hey Bears dont hate the messenger, the Truth bites sometimes! 😛

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The "TRUTH" your refering to, is as objective as the ..ACLU

 

[delldude]

Six out of ten are from the 'other persuasion'.....

Thought the GOP were evil nasty and bad as all hell.....

 

[local 12 proud]

Not sure why Bears is getting his depends all soiled :mellow:

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption does'nt endorse either party.

The list is in alphabetical order and just so happens to start with 'C'linton.

Hey Bears...did you notice there were no B's listed as in "el chimpo" :blush:

 

[Garfield1966]

Since we are using sources that are at best questionable and at worst biased and corrupt them selves lets see what crap the other side has to throw.

The 22 most corrupt members of Congress

Republican 'culture of corruption'

The actual Judical Watch list

Did no one notice (or care to notice that the list Local12 linked to was not the one noted in the link title? Tsk Tsk. His list was a site dedicated against Clinton. The actual list from Judicial Watch is a bit different. 6 out of the 10 are actually Republicans with 5 Dishonorable mentions 5D and 1R.

The BS cite that Local12 linked to did not even bother to copy the Judicial Watch cite (like they even tried). I guess they don;t realize that it is very easy to find the real site and see that they lied on their own site to bolster their biased view. Then again, anyone who goes that site does not have any interest in the truth so why bother to actually look for it right?

Local12,

Do you ever verify a source or do you just find stuff that looks good and fits your argument and post it?

 

[Garfield1966]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Judicial watch......A Gov. watchdog group, became KNOWN for it's first "client" Bill Clinton !


🙄 🙄 🙄 "Nice try"........."12". Check out the Rutherford group, and the Heritage foundation.

All "cornerstones" of the vast Right Wing Conspiricy ! :down: :down: :down:


Jesus, I wonder why TOM "DEE-LAY" never made it into the top 10 ??

The list that Loca12 pretended to link to and the one I linked to above was only for 2007. Delay was out of office prior to 2007 and is old news. As are Ginrich, Hassert and the rest.

 

[delldude]

The list that Loca12 pretended to link to and the one I linked to above was only for 2007. Delay was out of office prior to 2007 and is old news. As are Ginrich, Hassert and the rest.

What'd Gingrich do other than fall prey to the Clinton FBI files?

 

[local 12 proud]

Since we are using sources that are at best questionable and at worst biased and corrupt them selves lets see what crap the other side has to throw.

The 22 most corrupt members of Congress

Republican 'culture of corruption'

The actual Judical Watch list

Did no one notice (or care to notice that the list Local12 linked to was not the one noted in the link title? Tsk Tsk. His list was a site dedicated against Clinton. The actual list from Judicial Watch is a bit different. 6 out of the 10 are actually Republicans with 5 Dishonorable mentions 5D and 1R.

The BS cite that Local12 linked to did not even bother to copy the Judicial Watch cite (like they even tried). I guess they don;t realize that it is very easy to find the real site and see that they lied on their own site to bolster their biased view. Then again, anyone who goes that site does not have any interest in the truth so why bother to actually look for it right?

Local12,

Do you ever verify a source or do you just find stuff that looks good and fits your argument and post it?

Yes Gar, we know its always BS unless it lines up with your liberal rose colored view of things!

 

[Garfield1966]

What'd Gingrich do other than fall prey to the Clinton FBI files?

You mean aside from prosecuting a POTUS for doing something that he him self was doing and lying about while he was prosecuting the POTUS?


Ginrich quote

In April, Gingrich told supporters, "I will never again, as long as I am speaker, make a speech without commenting on this topic," referring to the presidential scandal. But as polls indicated a backlash, he abandoned that plan. And since Congress adjourned last week, Gingrich has campaigned for GOP candidates across the country, refusing to utter one word about the Clinton controversy.

He failed to mention that while he was railing against the sexual impropriety of Clinton, he was banging Callista Bisek a Congressional aid who was 23 years younger than him.

According to Anne Manning, a married woman who he was having an affair with in the 70's. She said :

"We had oral sex," Anne Manning revealed. "He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'" She added that Gingrich threatened her: "If you ever tell anybody about this, I'll say you're lying." This anticipated Bill Clinton's defense in the Monica Lewinsky scandal by many years. Great minds think alike!

Other than the fact that he is a hypocritical slime ball he is a stand up guy.

 

[Garfield1966]

Yes Gar, we know its always BS unless it lines up with your liberal rose colored view of things!

No you moron. The site you linked lied. Look at your site, then look at the actual Judicial Watch site. The lists don't match. The name of your site says it all. If you are going to link a site by NAME, try using the actual site.

I could care less what these BS site say to begin with. You are the one linking to a site that lied in order to further its agenda.

 

[delldude]

Different set of rules for doing BJ in the Big House Dude................congressmen are into pages if you

haven't done the 'Toe-Tap lately....

 

[Garfield1966]

Different set of rules for doing BJ in the Big House Dude................congressmen are into pages if you

haven't done the 'Toe-Tap lately....

I believe it would have been frowned upon regardless of what position government the person held. Republicans are much more intolerant of such behavior than those liberals are. You know, the family values BS that they spouted off about in in the 90's to take over? I do not thing Ginrich would have lasted. The Dems could have cared less that Clinton was getting his knob polished in the Oval. The economy was good and people were happy.

 

[Gilding the Lily]

No you moron. The site you linked lied. Look at your site, then look at the actual Judicial Watch site. The lists don't match. The name of your site says it all. If you are going to link a site by NAME, try using the actual site.

I could care less what these BS site say to begin with. You are the one linking to a site that lied in order to further its agenda.

Garfield,

I think you linked to an Old list in your previous post... here is 2007.

I think this one matches with the original one posted from the other site.