Always the victim...Jihadi John the masked executioner described as kind and gentle

[Ms Tree]

 

LoL.
 
Ms Tree you are nothing if not an endless source of entertainment.
 
Ms Tree you can flip-flop with the best politicians. No lie is too big right?

 

And you never answer a question when you are backed into a corner with your idiotic BS.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

   

And you never answer a question when you are backed into a corner with your idiotic BS.

What does it matter? Your libtard conditioning will not allow you to accept any answer that does not agree with the narrative. 
 
I have given you well researched answers before and posted the data to back it up. It fell on deaf ears. You are not interested in truth only pushing your agenda.
 
Why should I take time to provide an answer for someone I know will not accept it no matter what?
 
 
Signals pretty much has your number. He knows he is dealing with a delusional liar.

 

[southwind]

Basically what she's saying if you through enough money at it, it might go away!!! Isn't that the Democrat's answer to all our problem's! ------- And how is that working?

+100

 

[Ms Tree]

What does it matter? Your libtard conditioning will not allow you to accept any answer that does not agree with the narrative. 
 
I have given you well researched answers before and posted the data to back it up. It fell on deaf ears. You are not interested in truth only pushing your agenda.
 
Why should I take time to provide an answer for someone I know will not accept it no matter what?
 
 
Signals pretty much has your number. He knows he is dealing with a delusional liar.

You have posted a well researched response?

 

[Dog Wonder]

You have posted a well researched response?

He heard it on two different AM stations.

 

[signals]

You have posted a well researched response?

Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil.

In your book, EVIL is anything that doesn't suit your needs. If you lose you tend to not hear. You then try to SWITCH to another area that may prove your worthless point. You must always have the last word, which doesn't work with me.

La said:
I have given you well researched answers before and posted the data to back it up. It fell on deaf ears. You are not interested in truth only pushing your agenda.

He's right. Your response proves my comment. Denial is a wonderful thing, especially when you're in an asylum of others that think denial is a river in Egypt.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

What does it matter? Your libtard conditioning will not allow you to accept any answer that does not agree with the narrative. 
 
I have given you well researched answers before and posted the data to back it up. It fell on deaf ears. You are not interested in truth only pushing your agenda.
 
Why should I take time to provide an answer for someone I know will not accept it no matter what?

 

You have posted a well researched response?

I rest my case. 
 
It must be nice to have "corrective lenses" that let you see what you want to see.

 

[Ms Tree]

There is no case.  You said you have posted a "well researched answers".  I'm just asking when.  I have never seen one.
 
Usually one has to prove a case before one can rest.
 
 
Corrective lens.  That's funny.  You said Comon Core had a curiculum yet I proved it does not.  Just one of many things you believe bu are not true.  You believed that liberals do not have good marriages yet the study I posted proves you wrong on that count as well.  And here as well, the lady in the OP was cut off before she could even complete the thought and her thought was echoed by Bush, Powell and Mulen as well as others. 

 

[signals]

Wow. Talk about grabbing at straws! 🙄

Let's hope this is the LAST WORD until we hear that Jihadi John had a hellfire missle up his @$$!

 

[signals]

There is no case.  You said you have posted a "well researched answers".  I'm just asking when.  I have never seen one.
 
Usually one has to prove a case before one can rest.
 
 
Corrective lens.  That's funny.  You said Comon Core had a curiculum yet I proved it does not.  Just one of many things you believe bu are not true.  You believed that liberals do not have good marriages yet the study I posted proves you wrong on that count as well.  And here as well, the lady in the OP was cut off before she could even complete the thought and her thought was echoed by Bush, Powell and Mulen as well as others.

Yoo-hoo, Mys Try here's a statistic for YOU...

http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/marriage/10-surprising-divorce-facts/ss-BBi2Kdp#image=9

So contrary to your belief, by your statistics and facts, Democrats are more religious than you non-believers think.

Nice!

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

There is no case.  You said you have posted a "well researched answers".  I'm just asking when.  I have never seen one.
 
Usually one has to prove a case before one can rest.
 
 
Corrective lens.  That's funny.  You said Comon Core had a curiculum yet I proved it does not.  Just one of many things you believe bu are not true.  You believed that liberals do not have good marriages yet the study I posted proves you wrong on that count as well.  And here as well, the lady in the OP was cut off before she could even complete the thought and her thought was echoed by Bush, Powell and Mulen as well as others. 

Ms Tree I am not going to dig through these forums and pull examples of data I have posted and you have chosen to ignore. You are simply not worth the time or effort. 
 
I have said it before and I will say it again. You are not interested in truth, only pushing your political agenda. You will accept "surveys and polls" (usually taken by a leftist political group) but refuse to accept hard numbers supplied and verified by the CDC because it does not fit your narrative (which from what I have seen boils down to your going to support anything that sticks it to those pesky Christians). Again you have "corrective lenses" that let you see what you want to see and ignore anything that is inconvenient to the fiction you post.
 
Anybody that has spent any time on this forum knows what your all about.
 
If anybody on here chooses to believe a word that comes out of your lying mouth (or text you authored in this case) let them.
 
If you want me to show examples of you being a lying weasel just keep posting. With the frequency you lie I will get the opportunity soon enough.

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

but refuse to accept hard numbers supplied and verified by the CDC because it does not fit your narrative

So when hard employment and budget numbers were posted from MN and WI, they are "manufactured proof", but if you post statistics, all is good. (Even though you don't believe in statistics...unless you do)

Got it.

Btw, I thought you were told to get back in the basement and play your games.

 

[Ms Tree]

Ms Tree I am not going to dig through these forums and pull examples of data I have posted and you have chosen to ignore. You are simply not worth the time or effort. 
 
I have said it before and I will say it again. You are not interested in truth, only pushing your political agenda. You will accept "surveys and polls" (usually taken by a leftist political group) but refuse to accept hard numbers supplied and verified by the CDC because it does not fit your narrative (which from what I have seen boils down to your going to support anything that sticks it to those pesky Christians). Again you have "corrective lenses" that let you see what you want to see and ignore anything that is inconvenient to the fiction you post.
 
Anybody that has spent any time on this forum knows what your all about.
 
If anybody on here chooses to believe a word that comes out of your lying mouth (or text you authored in this case) let them.
 
If you want me to show examples of you being a lying weasel just keep posting. With the frequency you lie I will get the opportunity soon enough.

All that hot air to say you haven't got any examples.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

So when hard employment and budget numbers were posted from MN and WI, they are "manufactured proof", but if you post statistics, all is good. (Even though you don't believe in statistics...unless you do)

I think E already did a pretty good job of debasing the "proof" presented in the article. I guess what he said went over your head. Either that or you are all for "yellow journalism" when it supports your viewpoint. Most people would call that propaganda.
 
A count performed on a person by person basis and then logged is not a statistic derived from sampling. It is a hard confirmed number. I have already explained that to you several times. I guess you are too dense to understand the difference.
 

Btw, I thought you were told to get back in the basement and play your games.

You know what Glenn....... your pathetic. Grow up.
 

All that hot air to say you haven't got any examples.

Again, I will let your past speak for you. Anybody that doubts what I say can feel free to look at your post history and draw their own conclusions. 

 

[Ms Tree]

They can look at your history as well. What of it? Common Core, marriage, Haraf... to mention on 3 pieces of yor wisdom.

You made a statement. Try backing it up.