----------------
On 4/13/2003 11:29:44 AM ual747mech wrote:
----------------
On 4/13/2003 4:58:20 AM UAL_TECH wrote:
----------------
----------------
ual747mech,
I''ll wager that this POS will be voted down, and Da''Judge will have to do his ruling without capitulation of 141M.
IMHO!!!
Take Care,
UAL_TECH
----------------
K, I''ll double down on that. Of all people, I thought you''ve learned your lesson from the last take it to da Judge bravado. Oh well, you can vote "no" if you like but it will only get worse.
Btw, do you think we can improve this by voting it down? Do you think the IAM will capitulate or fight? Do you think we will accomplish anything if we struck the company after their proposal gets implemented after the contract gets abrogated? Just wanna ask your honest opinion cause you seem to be a smart fella.
Take care homy
----------------
ual747mech,
If you remember, I was ''FOR'' PEBI, PEBII, and ATSB votes.
(I was looking at this from an ''OWNERS'' perspective, much to the chagrin of my peers.)
If ''ANYONE'' believes that Da''Judge will give them a better deal, they should not be working on aircraft!!!
The choice is:
A) ''6 years'' of this contract, and the iam.
B) Da''Judge with the hope of AMFA at Chapter 11 exit.
That''s the crux of it.
It is for all of us to evaluate on an individual basis.
I can understand both sides of this issue, and will certainly not berate anyone for their decision.
Pick One!
-IMHO-
Take Care Bro,
UAL_TECH